[citation][nom]marcolorenzo[/nom]Well the thing with the Nexus 7 is, Asus/Google are hardly making a dime with each device sold. They are using it to put their foot in the door, that's all. They're not aiming to make a big profit with every sale so it being cheap/has good performance shouldn't be a reflection on the Tegra 3.[/citation]
The SOC itself is only a small part of the price, and Nexus 7 is not the only cheap Tegra 3 tablet (Acer 110, 210). Is there a faster 7" tablet at the moment, at any price? I don't think so.
[citation][nom]marcolorenzo[/nom]Also, Tegra 3 may be 14 months old now, but it was never that fast to begin with. I think there was only about a month of difference between the Tegra 3 and the Snapdragon S4 and it was immediately trumped by Qualcomm's offering. I think the only thing they could boast was being the first to come out with a mobile quad-core.[/citation]
Which tablets had Snapdragon S4 and when was the first of them released? The first Tegra 3 tablet was Asus Transformer Prime I think, and it was released on Dec 1st 2011. When was the first S4 tablet released? Okay, when was the first S4 phone released?
And finally, the difference between Tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4. Look at http://www.technobuffalo.com/2012/04/11/benchmarked-nvidia-tegra-3-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-s4/
It's a comparison between Tegra 3 and S4, and Tegra 3 comes out as the overall winner. This comparison http://androidandme.com/2012/05/smartphones-2/htc-one-x-snapdragon-s4-vs-tegra-3-in-performance-gpu-battery-life-and-web-browsing/ says Tegra 3 wins on gaming, and for other uses it's hard to tell the difference (except S4 has a LTE modem, but that's not really CPU/GPU performance).
Obviously, new versions of S4 came out since , and those do beat Tegra 3, but that was six months after it was released, so it's clear that Tegra 3 products were the fastest for a period of 6 months at least.