Transcend's New SSDs: Up To 192 GB

Status
Not open for further replies.
I could live with the lower performance figures for a cheap 8GB SLC drive.

Would be good for serving small files quickly.
 
[citation][nom]KITH[/nom]I could live with the lower performance figures for a cheap 8GB SLC drive.Would be good for serving small files quickly.[/citation]
You would still be bottlenecked by your network connection in most cases. SSDs really shine in I/O per second such as in the server market. At that price point, Transcend is basically telling us "this is for enthusiasts, business users and people with money to burn".
 
[citation][nom]KITH[/nom]I could live with the lower performance figures for a cheap 8GB SLC drive.Would be good for serving small files quickly.[/citation]
I would love to get a couple cheap 8GBs in a Raid 0
 
I wonder why they released an 8GB version.
It's barely enough to host Linux and some files...
For XP 12GB +files is pretty sufficient, 24GB preferably.
Vista at least 16GB,32GB preferably.
 
For a drive that's supposed to be more robust and resistant to damage than a HDD, they're really skimping on the warranty.
2 years warranty for a data storage device? Not for me...
 
[citation][nom]antiacid[/nom] At that price point, Transcend is basically telling us "this is for enthusiasts, business users and people with money to burn".[/citation]
Someone should tell them the x 25-e 32gb sells for less than half (making raid look extremely attractive if you have the money) and is faster than their 64gb slc drive.
 
$600 for an ssd drive?!? Are you crazy?
All of these prices should be only 1/3 of that price NOW, not in 2-6 years, and that is for a 512gb ssd drive (state of the art today). A comparable hdd is only $40-65 at retail for 500gb, so an SSD should only be a small multiple, not 10x.
 
We're almost there, can't wait until these get to mainstream prices. 2x would be reasonable at this point. It's just glorified memory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.