Trinity PD vs FX-4100 BD

$hawn

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2009
854
1
19,060
hey does ny1 have any benchmarks of trinity vs bulldozer.....granted this is just a mobile trinity chip without L3 cahe, and not Vishera yet, i was just curious to see how they stack up against each other:)

Basically, single threaded performance of,

A10-4600M, @2.3GHZ , Turbo disabled
Against
FX 4100, @2.3GHZ, Turbo disabled (does any mobo have the option of turning off the L3 cache to make this more even??)

Both running equal amounts of memory at the same speed :)
 

$hawn

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2009
854
1
19,060
nope:) I didn't think it would be appropriate; that place is a mess....people there keep yapping about compiler optimization, intels bad practises, and about how Obama should invest in AMD!!!

What'd u suggest, should i repost it over there??!
 

noob2222

Distinguished
Nov 19, 2007
2,722
0
20,860

scroll back about 6 pages.
 

bawchicawawa

Distinguished
Dec 27, 2011
350
0
18,810
"Did my own tests

Sandra%20arith.png


8120 @ 4 cores, 2.3 ghz.

30.27 & 20.39 clearly an improvement, ~10% not taking into account whatever benefit l3 cache has on this test

Sandra%20MM.png


84.3, 31.5, 58, 42.67

still improved, question still remains, how much does l3 help this test?

Cinebench 11.5, 1.59
trinity cinebench 2.05

quite an improvement there.
Message quoted 1 times
"