Hi all
I've done a fair bit of research into what CPU I should really be looking into getting for gaming. (building a fresh new rig).
Now, I came across an article recently which compared CPU's in games, and from the article (for the life of me I can't find it, but I'm sure someone will know what I'm talking about) seems to conclude that there isn't really a lick of difference between the more recently released CPU's, whether it be AMD or Intel, 2 cores or 4.
But everywhere I turn people are recommending i7's and Phenom's; 4 core processors.
As we are all well aware, the difference between CPU prices is quite large, and given that the article found there to be very little difference performance-wise in games, it does not seem logical to me to fork out for a four core CPU and, say, an x58 M/B.
Is there something I'm missing? Please can somebody clear this up for me
I've done a fair bit of research into what CPU I should really be looking into getting for gaming. (building a fresh new rig).
Now, I came across an article recently which compared CPU's in games, and from the article (for the life of me I can't find it, but I'm sure someone will know what I'm talking about) seems to conclude that there isn't really a lick of difference between the more recently released CPU's, whether it be AMD or Intel, 2 cores or 4.
But everywhere I turn people are recommending i7's and Phenom's; 4 core processors.
As we are all well aware, the difference between CPU prices is quite large, and given that the article found there to be very little difference performance-wise in games, it does not seem logical to me to fork out for a four core CPU and, say, an x58 M/B.
Is there something I'm missing? Please can somebody clear this up for me