Part of the reason for the production cost difference is proximity to raw materials. The USA is at a huge disadvantage since most of the raw materials come from areas in or around China, Taiwan and India. The materials necessary for production would have to be shipped to the USA, increasing cost.Yeah. When most American companies moves production to other countries because USA is too expensive...
So company has to deside between: destroy the companys competativines by investing USA or fullfill the security demand of USA and invest in USA...
Most companies just say to USA cowernment that They should just make their own hardware by USA cowernment own factories and leave busines to do what busines do. USA is starting to sound more like communist country and that is worrying... we have enough of communist countries allready. IMHO. If USA wants to get more production to its soil, it should make the production in the USA cheaper than anywhere else. That is more in line what USA is for. Free country that supports economy and free enterprice. Not by forsing and intimidating companies...
If the US had government-provided healthcare, like most developed nations, that would certainly reduce the cost of labor and make it more competitive.What we should be doing is funding US manufacturing altogether so we don't have to rely on Chinese companies to make our goods, regardless of the cost. Especially considering China's ongoing theft of intellectual property and cyber aggression, this would be a good move overall.
I think that's more a matter of the finished products being relatively expensive to ship into the North American market. Shipping a vehicle halfway around the world undoubtedly counters a lot of the savings gained from lower manufacturing costs, especially for countries that have relatively high manufacturing costs themselves. Something like a processor, on the other hand, shouldn't cost much to ship, so that doesn't really apply there.I guess that's why lots of foreign car companies have plants in the US.
Then, how is it that Intel and IBM/Global Foundries have fabs in the US?The educational system in the US is a joke. TSMC would NEVER be able to find the engineers it needs to work the factories in the US.
BMW actually makes vehicles for export, in the US! There are probably other examples, but that's one I know for sure. In fact, I think some of those vehicles were even exported to China, surprisingly.I think that's more a matter of the finished products being relatively expensive to ship into the North American market. Shipping a vehicle halfway around the world undoubtedly counters a lot of the savings gained from lower manufacturing costs
A lot of US-based auto manufacturing simply moved to non-union states.See what happened to Detroit, once the worldwide leader in automobile manufacturing. Even when the big US automakers were struggling to compete with the overseas market, you see the labor unions repeatedly going on strike, wanting more pay and benefits, while ignoring the fact that the workers are already being paid pretty well for what they do. Now, a lot of manufacturing has moved out of the region, and Detroit's population has dropped to less than half of what it had been several decades prior. And you still see the unions staging strikes.
I think that comes down to BMWs being somewhat more "luxury" cars, or at least the models built in the US fall into that category, so manufacturing costs are probably less relevant than for a model competing more aggressively on price. And again, I suspect the manufacturing costs would not be much better in Germany.BMW actually makes vehicles for export, in the US! There are probably other examples, but that's one I know for sure