News TSMC: Shortage of Nvidia's AI GPUs to Persist for 1.5 Years

Status
Not open for further replies.

NeoMorpheus

Reputable
Jun 8, 2021
223
251
4,960
42dddp.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sleepy_Hollowed

edzieba

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2016
512
498
19,260
Whilst he was talking about the AI market (because that was what the conference session was about) any package that relies on TSMCs advanced packaging would also be affected. That includes Ryzen with 3D vCache (SoIC), chiplet-based Radeon (InFO _oS), Nvidia GPUs with HBM (CoWoS-S), etc. Intel would not be affected (by this particular bottleneck) as they have their own packaging capability.
 
Last edited:

The Hardcard

Distinguished
Jul 25, 2014
32
42
18,560
Whilst he was talking about the AI market (because that was what the conference session was about) any package that relies on TSMCs advanced packaging would also be affected. That includes Ryzen with 3D vCache (SoIC), chiplet-based Radeon (InFO _oS), Nvidia GPUs with HBM (CoWoS-S), etc. Intel would not be affected (by this particular bottleneck) as they have their own packaging capability.

A big part of the issue is that packaging capacity had already been fully allocated. Nvidia‘s main problem is trying to get more allocation because of surging market demand. So companies that are not increasing their demand above what they have already allocated won’t be affected as much.

also, some companies will be able to shift needs. AMD definitely needs to increase capacity for their new AI products, but given that they use the same modular designs for multiple products they can shift needs. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if that contributed to the cancellation of Navi 41. It appears that that was going to have a similar active interposer design as their MI 300 series.

Whatever the reasons it was cancelled, they can now turn that packaging allocation to the big money AI GPU chips .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt_ogu812

Matt_ogu812

Honorable
Jul 14, 2017
160
32
10,620
Whilst he was talking about the AI market (because that was what the conference session was about) any package that relies on TSMCs advanced packaging would also be affected. That includes Ryzen with 3D vCache (SoIC), chiplet-based Radeon (InFO _oS), Nvidia GPUs with HBM (CoWoS-S), etc. Intel would not be affected (by this particular bottleneck) as they have their own packaging capability.
Merely reading about this will create a shortage.
The Power of Suggestion.
 

Matt_ogu812

Honorable
Jul 14, 2017
160
32
10,620
A big part of the issue is that packaging capacity had already been fully allocated. Nvidia‘s main problem is trying to get more allocation because of surging market demand. So companies that are not increasing their demand above what they have already allocated won’t be affected as much.

also, some companies will be able to shift needs. AMD definitely needs to increase capacity for their new AI products, but given that they use the same modular designs for multiple products they can shift needs. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if that contributed to the cancellation of Navi 41. It appears that that was going to have a similar active interposer design as their MI 300 series.

Whatever the reasons it was cancelled, they can now turn that packaging allocation to the big money AI GPU chips .
A big part of the issue is finding a place to store/hide all these 'obscene profits' from the auditors :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoxNix

edzieba

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2016
512
498
19,260
A big part of the issue is that packaging capacity had already been fully allocated. Nvidia‘s main problem is trying to get more allocation because of surging market demand. So companies that are not increasing their demand above what they have already allocated won’t be affected as much.

also, some companies will be able to shift needs. AMD definitely needs to increase capacity for their new AI products, but given that they use the same modular designs for multiple products they can shift needs. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if that contributed to the cancellation of Navi 41. It appears that that was going to have a similar active interposer design as their MI 300 series.

Whatever the reasons it was cancelled, they can now turn that packaging allocation to the big money AI GPU chips .
Allocations are not necessarily fixed in stone, as we saw during the supply chain disruption during COVID and the resultant shortages of low-margin chips (where packaging costs can be a significant fraction or dominate total part cost over die costs) those who can pay for priority will take fab and packaging time for those who cannot. It becomes a race of who can pay more for production priority, which with demand exceeding supply leads to the price spirals we have seen over the last few years - if you don't up your bids you don't get your product manufactured, so only the products that pay more for manufacture end up getting made at all, so only the products that need higher margins to sustain due to inflated costs make it to sale, so only the only products on sale are the ones with inflated prices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.