UCSC Students Creating Killer StarCraft Bot

[exfileme]

Two PhD students are working on an AI that will kick your butt in StarCraft.

UCSC Students Creating Killer StarCraft Bot : Read more

 

[icemunk]

pHD students and they're only at a 20% win ratio? I hope they just started...

 

[zorky9]

[citation][nom]icemunk[/nom]pHD students and they're only at a 20% win ratio? I hope they just started...[/citation]
Considering it's playing against the world's best players it's a good start.

 

[zak_mckraken]

A bot that will Zerg rush me? How clever.

 

[daft]

Despite being over 10 years old, StarCraft does not have a dominant strategy.

i take it that they never heard of a zergling rush

 

[gzhang]

[citation][nom]daft[/nom]i take it that they never heard of a zergling rush[/citation]

You got rushed if you are bad or take the risk and expanded, else the rushing guy will usually lag in econ.

Anyway, it will be a interesting project. Consider the complexity of the game, a 20% win is good. I wonder if the AI takes in considerations when a terran is shelling over a cliff and try to lure the toss army in for an ambush.

 

[Silluete]

Why don't just add maphack to ai eh, it's must be more easier.

 

[drowned]

I wonder what the build in computer would score cause 20% seems kinda low. And this article doesn't specify whether the 20% win was against average (random) players or professional ones.

 

[sseyler]

[citation][nom]icemunk[/nom]pHD students and they're only at a 20% win ratio? I hope they just started...[/citation]

The implication from this statement shows you don't really know anything about PhD research in engineering/science-related fields. PhD students aren't necessarily geniuses... Their certainly smart, but doing research doesn't involve conquering everything you touch. Research involves dedicated work towards reasonable goals set by a thesis. These goals constantly evolve as the research matures. It's a learning process, not a process of conquest.

 

[Kelavarus]

[citation][nom]zorky9[/nom]Considering it's playing against the world's best players it's a good start.[/citation]

"It's easy to find players interested in playing the EISBot"

I missed the part where they were designated as the world's best players...

 

[trandoanhung1991]

Try make a bot for yourself, then talk.

Anyway, what they're doing is certainly impressive. I hope that they won't resort to the kind of cheap cheats developers are using nowadays instead of real AI.

 

[thepinkpanther]

some of the things the bot is doing is outright unfair, no human can click that fast.

 

[sliem]

Of course it's not easy. A bot that plays against a computer, like in World of Warcraft is easier than a bot that plays against a HUMAN brain.

However, 20% is a just a number. We need #s of win and loses against what faction.

Also they said the bot is protoss exclusive, why is the video only shows Terran?

 

[Guest]

Actually, the Panda Bear Guy is a nickname for the critter that you see in that video. It gets blown up at :17. The AI is playing against the default Starcraft AI (see the video description).

Cute, but it's not going to be beating top players anytime soon.

 

[beachbod]

[citation][nom]thepinkpanther[/nom]some of the things the bot is doing is outright unfair, no human can click that fast.[/citation]

Yeah if they are going to make an AI thats going to beat the best player in the world then it should be based on skill not because a human player couldnt possibly click or move the mouse as fast as a computer. A computer AI will be able to micromanage at any speed. The player should have the option to play it in slow motion if he so chooses to level the playing field.

 

[icemunk]

[citation][nom]zorky9[/nom]Considering it's playing against the world's best players it's a good start.[/citation]

Nowhere in the article does it say they've played against the best, it says they've played against players in 30 different countries, that is all.

 

[conanstwin]

This is for the contest EIS at UCSC is hosting.
http://eis.ucsc.edu/StarCraftAICompetition
There are lots of entries that deserve stories as well. It will be more interesting to see who wins.

 

[sseyler]

[citation][nom]sseyler[/nom]The implication from this statement shows you don't really know anything about PhD research in engineering/science-related fields. PhD students aren't necessarily geniuses... Their certainly smart, but doing research doesn't involve conquering everything you touch. Research involves dedicated work towards reasonable goals set by a thesis. These goals constantly evolve as the research matures. It's a learning process, not a process of conquest.[/citation]

EDIT: They're* God, my grammar is awful.

 

[MamiyaOtaru]

[citation][nom]icemunk[/nom]Nowhere in the article does it say they've played against the best, it says they've played against players in 30 different countries, that is all.[/citation]
yeah, and 30 countries implies at least 29 countries that are not Korea, hence not the best

 

[evolvedpc]

Hmmm, I'm neither a PhD student, nor artificially intelligent, but I very much doubt that I would achieve a 20% win ratio in online StarCraft.

I would be interested to know if they are trying to write an algorithm specifically tailored to be effective at StarCraft, or whether they are writing a more general purpose learning algorithm and simply testing its effectiveness on StarCraft.

 

[anamaniac]

I'm actually impressed.
But, is every single unit individually micromanaged? Something that would be generally impossible for a human to do when controlling dozens of units?
I suck at RTS games because I can't control any more than 2 units at a time effectively...

Keep up the good work.

 

[K-zon]

Seems like an interesting AI idea. I seen the one with the Terran but it just looked as if the A.I. was Group attacking within the Group which is very useful to do if you can mirco that far down.

What seems interesting the most out of this, is. If they start in on Making different and better A.I. system that allow reduce these mirco-management , then will say on the players side of features, will there be ways to incorporate a way to deal with such advanced A.I. ?
Very interesting though. I dont play StarCraft but still.

 

[FloKid]

I have a feeling the war is coming to an end, it will be soon a GG for Korea. What's next finger augmentation for StarCraft II?

 

[Guest]

Lol I can only imagine when it's 100% win ratio.

 

[randomizer]

Yeah if they are going to make an AI thats going to beat the best player in the world then it should be based on skill not because a human player couldnt possibly click or move the mouse as fast as a computer.

There are some RTS players that would rival a computer in click speed.

Remember that current generation AI has an inherent disadvantage that the human does not: It can only do what it is programmed to do with some limited "learning" capacity (which is also programmed so I suppose it's not even worth mentioning). The human can randomise strategies far more easily because unlike software we can think outside the box. It takes time for the AI to adapt and it will never predict exactly what the human player is going to do with perfect accuracy even though it may be able to respond to a perceived threat with very little delay. Computers are perfectly logical, humans are not.

Pure speed does not necessarily overcome skill. Existing AI is also very fast, yet has Buckley's chance of beating a seasoned player in any game in any genre. The gap will continue to close but until we reach the Singularity it will not be a perfect match.