Ultra-Sharpen is on sale!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"John Doe" <john_doe@nospam.com> wrote in
news:%uKxd.13480$_3.152345@typhoon.sonic.net:

> Now spam as far as I am concerned is when you post things like "look
> at my ass" to every newsgroup there is. What I did is not spam, those
> that consider it that have their own mental problems and will not
> affect me in any way, plain and simple.

1. It is not up to you to decide what spam is, nor me.
It is my belief though that very few people think
that spam has anything to do with asses.

2. I was writing about cross posting, not spam.
Therefore I don't understand your reply.

3. Make calling other people that disagree with you
"mentally ill" make you feel more comfortable?

4. You still being here proves that you are affected by
what others write.


/Roland
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In message <_lGxd.13421$_3.151956@typhoon.sonic.net>,
"John Doe" <john_doe@nospam.com> wrote:

>Well, thank you for pointing that out. I was under the impression from all
>of the flames others have gotten from cross posting that it was the wrong
>way to go.

Cross-posting is not a bad thing, per se, as long as the post is
appropriate for all of the groups involved. Of course, many cross-posts
are off-topic, trolls, or spam, so a lot of people automatically react
unfavorably to all cross-posts.
--

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

In message <41c73ede$0$142$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
"Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@no.spam> wrote:

>Actually it is, if constained to a few relevant groups. Multi-posting
>consumes hue ammounts of bandwidth/storage, whereas crossposting
>doesn't. So in fact is is encouraged to cross-post, if you are
>compelled to do so...

The way I understand it, if you cross-post to 100 newsgroups, the text
only appears once on the news servers; the header line that contains the
group names is only longer.
--

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

"John Doe" <john_doe@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:zz_xd.13625$_3.154440@typhoon.sonic.net...

>
> But, instead we now have threads with 20 or 30 or more spam messages.
> Frankly, I don't think any of you have room to talk about my posts. At
least
> my were on topic!
>
> John

But John...
You are a top poster too and that, added to cross poster, means you are
really a bad, bad, boy. Now incorporate the cardinal sin of spamming the
groups - which incidentally no one dropping the can on you would ever, ever
think of doing... And you have what I would call multiple sinning Johnny.

You are probably aware that the only people allowed to have multiple sins in
these groups are not allowed to Spam. Let's face it, John... You'll have to
buy a Canon and become one of the anointed few allowed to have multiple
sins!

Doug
 
Status
Not open for further replies.