Camikazi:
"And a super powerful CPU is useless as well since you won't do anything really CPU intensive either. AMD would still be better though since while heavy gaming won't be done, videos and some light gaming will and AMD CPU/GPU combo will most likely do better overall."
Completely untrue. You can do a lot with a powerful CPU. Many of us will be moving to this platform for our work since it is so mobile. I'll be doing just about everything on it including engineering type tasks such as software development and testing. A strong CPU makes all the world of difference. That is why they upgrade their CPUs every year (duh).
As far as GPU goes, it is less important but still important. I don't play games on my systems and if I did, they would be lesser games. I've seen most of the gaming benchmarks and until you get to the really complicated games, the difference between current Sandy Bridge and Fusion is minimal if not negligible. I take it serious gamers will buy serious gaming rigs. Those of us who want to be ultra mobile will buy these form factors and most of those people likely aren't buying them for hard core gaming. They are likely buying them for business needs. Some of them will be travelers (whether car or airline travelers). It is the perfect form factor for them.
By the way, the new Ivy Bridge will have a significantly faster GPU and light years faster in the CPU department than what AMD is selling so it makes little sense to go with AMD. I will buy one of these when the Ivy Bridge comes out so that I get tremendous CPU performance that I can use for all of my needs while getting a graphics component that is good enough to stand on it's own against the competition.
It is kind of a no brainer. I used to use AMD but their CPUs have been barely passable lately.