For work, I run a program (Chief Architect) that has an internal raytrace program to create 3D images. According to tech support, the program uses the cpu, not gpu to process the images, and # of cores is the #1 determining factor in performance, and clock speed is important, but secondary.
I currently have an overclocked 2600k (4.7) that runs well, no problems and runs at 100% 20-30 hrs a week. My question, is, would dual E5-2650's, with increased cores, but lower clock speed be a logical upgrade?
I would most likely build new, instead of trying to upgrade what I have, but all other components would be similar (dual vid cards, ssd, liquid cooled).
I am looking at the 2650's, because I am trying to keep the build under 5k.
Thanks!
I currently have an overclocked 2600k (4.7) that runs well, no problems and runs at 100% 20-30 hrs a week. My question, is, would dual E5-2650's, with increased cores, but lower clock speed be a logical upgrade?
I would most likely build new, instead of trying to upgrade what I have, but all other components would be similar (dual vid cards, ssd, liquid cooled).
I am looking at the 2650's, because I am trying to keep the build under 5k.
Thanks!