Question Userbenchmark bad result

Nov 19, 2019
3
0
10
hi guys so i just buy a new ssd Kingston A400 480Gb for my pc and graphic card AMD RX 590 so i did run a userbenchmark and i got this

UserBenchmarks: Game 53%, Desk 68%, Work 41%

||Model|Bench
:----|:----|:----|
CPU|Intel Core i5-4690K|73.2%
GPU|AMD RX 590|53%
SSD|Kingston A400 480GB|63.3%
HDD|WD Purple 1TB (2014)|86.2%
RAM|G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB|61.2%
MBD|MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)|


so ssd performing below expectation and yes i did verify that i have a 3.0 sata that runs at 6gbs/sec same thing goes for my new graphic card so i need help ...
 
Nov 19, 2019
3
0
10
yes i did it like 4-5 times always bad .. SSD have 130gb left of 480 and its new from like 1 week cpu/gpu temp during the benchmark or in game ? and for the psu its an old one my build was like 6 years ago i think its a 650w gold edition antec tp-650c model name i think
 
Userbenchmark instructs you to disable vsync, so make sure it’s not enabled before you test. 53% is not bad, just not the best for your gpu. This one is scoring above 70%, but compare the gpu and vram clocks to yours: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/21793786#GRAPHICS_CARD

Understand that there are people submitting test results with liquid nitrogen cooled, highly overclocked rigs and that will make your air-cooled or even liquid cooled rig look worse. And the 53% ranking for your gpu is amongst all gpus, including the RTX Titan. As another person suggested, look at some reviews for the 590 and compare fps tests to what you’re getting, from the same game or benchmark software if you can so you get an apples to apples comparison.

Same goes for your SSD - it’s compared to all other SSDs. Look up read/write benchmarks from reviews and compare to your crystal diskmark results.
 
Last edited:

atljsf

Honorable
BANNED
to know how well the ssd does, i always use crystaldiskmark, userbenchmark tells me nothing, because it shows nothing in terms of the exact results

remember to run the kingston update tool, if the a400 needs a firmware update, run it adn then run the update again, the a400 is not a pseed demon but should give you 500mbs on read and around 400 on write, perhaps abit less

userbenchmark is not that deifintive in my opinion, crystaldiskmark is more clear on the results i think
 
Nov 19, 2019
3
0
10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 7.0.0 x64 (C) 2007-2019 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World: https://crystalmark.info/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
  • KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 398.008 MB/s [ 379.6 IOPS] < 21029.59 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 323.388 MB/s [ 308.4 IOPS] < 3237.92 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 242.906 MB/s [ 59303.2 IOPS] < 8617.67 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 19.735 MB/s [ 4818.1 IOPS] < 206.60 us>

[Write]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 309.780 MB/s [ 295.4 IOPS] < 26945.65 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 80.958 MB/s [ 77.2 IOPS] < 12941.51 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 111.696 MB/s [ 27269.5 IOPS] < 18673.02 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 54.135 MB/s [ 13216.6 IOPS] < 75.37 us>

Profile: Default
Test: 1 GiB (x5) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED>
Date: 2019/11/22 5:14:23
OS: Windows 10 [10.0 Build 18363] (x64)