Question Userbenchmark found problems with my system please help

[Carcosa]

Here are the results of my Userbenchmark, my system was only in the 39 percentile and my gpu ram and SSD were all underperfoming

UserBenchmarks: Game 129%, Desk 145%, Work 125%
CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K - 106.9%
GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 - 146.5%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 294.4%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017) - 65.1%
RAM: G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB - 75.5%
MBD: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING


https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/16659804#GRAPHICS_CARD




Any help is appreciated, sadly my graphics card rtx 2080 seems to be performing the worst of anything. I noticed low framerates on Battlefield V and not sure why

Sean

 

[rgd1101]

post the link to the result, not the page of the result

ram not running at 3000
like it said " ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled"

 

[Carcosa]

thank you i will edit the post

 

[rgd1101]

it the ram, use the xmp profile

 

[Carcosa]

ok I fixed the xmp in bios, i had tried something in the bios that stopped my system from working properly and just reset the whole thing without realizing xmp was turned off. So I fixed the xmp setting in the bios and retested the system but my graphics card is still underperforming. Is this because its not overclocked?

Here are the new results

https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/16660271

 

[rgd1101]

what do you mean if you read it carefully, your is 149%, avg RTX 2080 is 147%. unless you want to upgrade, you are doing pretty well

 

[Carcosa]

ok thanks there was just something in red saying it was like 39 percent or somthing ok great im good to go then thanks a lot!!!

 

[cryoburner]

Something doesn't look quite right for UserBench's data on that card. The chart clearly shows them as being a bit below the curve, there's a notice that their card only performs better than 32 percent of 2080s tested, and yet they apparently scored slightly above the average bench for a 2080. Things seem to be getting calculated wrong somewhere. In any case, we're only looking at a few percent difference at most between these results and what appears to be the actual average, so I wouldn't read too much into it. The card appears to be running normal.

 

[Carcosa]

I very slightly overclocked the card and got it from 32nd percentile to 59th percentile so and it went from something like 147% to 154%