[SOLVED] Userbenchmark vs Samsung Magician = Poor results in Userbenchmark

Nahkriin

Prominent
Apr 2, 2020
1
0
510
Hello, sorry for poor english first , but you'll get it I'm sure.

So I'm having a problem with userbenchmark test, I'll provide all pictures with the results, and if you want to know something else beside this I'll take a capture.

Userbenchmark :
SFz4m27.png


Samsung Magician :
J4tTfTi.png


Dns84G5.png


3jDYjjD.png


Samsung Magician shows the right results for both drives, but something lacks in userbenchmark and it performs poorly.
Anyone have similar situations, what might be the problem here? Thanks for helping

Samsung 970 Evo Plus :
WPVArbG.png


Crucial CT1000PSSD8 :
BKaOfFC.png
 
Last edited:
Solution
Maybe that's the level it's performing at. My NVMe seems to have better data in diskmark, and also in userbench. They are both better by about the same factor for each category. There could be many reasons. PCIe version, MB, CPU, heat etc... You're still getting good speeds compared to older hard drives ;-)

P9DvQhlr_o.png


mvBXzCkb_o.png

wcndave

Reputable
Mar 16, 2016
12
0
4,510
Maybe that's the level it's performing at. My NVMe seems to have better data in diskmark, and also in userbench. They are both better by about the same factor for each category. There could be many reasons. PCIe version, MB, CPU, heat etc... You're still getting good speeds compared to older hard drives ;-)

P9DvQhlr_o.png


mvBXzCkb_o.png
 
Solution