Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (
More info?)
In article <dkoqo0p1mv5t020h246vsp0rskrsmu4316@4ax.com>,
badnews@hansenonline.net says...
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:22:09 GMT, BlueBottle spoketh
>
> >Ah, I see.
> >Thats for telling me this !!
You've saved me a lot of time !
> >So for the DWL2100 units, how would I define them in the RADIUS setup?
> >(That is how would they be described? Same as users???)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bob.
>
> The DWL should be defined as a radius client. Your policies (at least in
> IAS) will define which users (in the Active Directory or Domain) will be
> allowed access via the available radius client(s).
>
> Actually, upon reviewing what can be done in IAS, you can actually
> disable authentication altogether, in which case you'd only be getting
> the keys. However, since TKIP renegotiates keys every so often anyways,
> using radius simply for that is just adding more complexity where it is
> not needed.
>
> Lars M. Hansen
>
http://www.hansenonline.net
> (replace 'badnews' with 'news' in e-mail address)
>
OK, the full picture ! A friend and I are going to share our two
networks via two DWL2100's set in bridge-bridge mode. I was wanting to
use the TKIP feature (for the hell of it) and was looking
(automatically) at using RADIUS.
From what you say, I should be able to get just keys from an IAS setup?
This is new to me (IAS) so I don't have much to ask about that yet !!
IAS runs under Win2K / Win2K server? This would be a much better option
for me since I already have one of those builds in place.
Cheers,
Bob.