[[QOUTE]["...overlapping an install from one os type over an existing install from another for the sake of saving a few hundred megs of space. It seems like asking for trouble.]
Yeah, exactly. I agree. WinNT is strong enough not allowing much tricks and jokes, but MS Office2000 isn't a perfect software creating some mess and littering with tmp files after install and update. Not a good idea at all to share some common space for programs. Except data. Documents I mean.
[EDITED by NickM]
I want you to understand me correctly.
Back in 1996 I had MS Office 6 installed on a NT Server from severel workstations. Recently I discovered that one of co-worker's machine had in the same directory mirrored from old harddrivers DOS, several updates to different Windows throug Win3.1, 95, 98. And WinNT. She had in the same C: directory MS Office 97 installed from Win9x and Office 2000 from WinNT. The machine worked with no complanes. She didn't use the Win9x actually. And there're more examples with dual MS Office2000 installations in that company, but the troubles began after MS Office 2000 came. And little by little the systems are reinstalling now.
My point is MS Ofice 2000 (and Internet Explorer as well) isn't the right software to do such share. MS Office97 is solid as a rock if we compare with MS Office2000.
The way you're asking <b>will work</b>, anyway,
as Rob Arrow mentioned above.
It'll work even in one mutual for Win9x and WinNT partition C: and you can create up to 4 GB FAT16 single partition (if answer ignore) when boot from WinNT CD, not rational though.
Sure it'll work installed in either separate Win9x or WinNT partition. Or into the 3d mutual partition, say "FAT16 Program Partition". In the last case you'll be able to have a large NTFS partition for WinNT.
And you can save up to 155-180 MB of space in any of above combination.
May be it's good enough for home. Install Office SP1, and (if you want) WinNT SP6a on top again. Can't recommend for corporate computers/network. <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by NickM on 07/23/01 02:15 PM.</EM></FONT></P>