How is what AI does any different than what the human brain does? Yes, this applies to art too. Most artists have styles that are OBVIOUSLY influenced directly by other artists. AI just has an audit trail for how it constructs art. Heck, entire art 'types' are essentially the entire market imitating one successful artist's unique style. All Impressionist art is essentially other artists stealing from Monet.
Exactly. There are two types of artists. Those who make money off of it and those who see it as a hobby/passion.
Incidentially, only the former group is angry......(Yes I made my own research).
There is nothing wrong with A.I generated art if it has been trained on public data. If you post something online like this comment, IT'S PUBLIC. How on earth do people not know this is mind baffling to me ........
The art industry won't have an impact, this will sieve the pool and leave behind people who actually/genuinely love art rather than seeing it as a cash cow.
For example, I would much rather get an oil painting by a real human rather than a mechanical machine into the future.
(Real) Artists will be fine.
A.I generated art will only aid people, who aren't art specialists. I was thinking about creating a game with A.I art/textures too but now with this false takedown, I wonder whether Valve is high. Anime Unity Template garbage is being spammed onto Steam, yet A.I generated textures is not allowed?
Should we even respect Steam as a knowledged platform? Seems more like a decade long terrible student software project, that steals 30% off of developers, which is more than some actually criminals charge....