Valve CEO Game Newell Teases Linux Steam Boxes

Status
Not open for further replies.

damianrobertjones

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2010
587
1
18,995
"Valve CEO Gabe Newell has said that Linux is the future of gaming" - Did he announce this before he knew about the Windows 8 store or after? Oh yeah, after. It's funny as Windows has been his cake and he's obviously annoyed at MS.

P.s. @toddybody: "I would be over the moon to give MS the finger and move towards a more secure, open standard OS. " - I bet you're running Windows as full administrator. I'm amused when people complain about windows not being secure you run it WIDE open. Please, please, run as a standard user and see how safe it is!
 
While this is something to look foward to, one has to wonder how much of it is actually true. If you work for the largest gaming distribution company and that company is trying to expand into Linux, it is expected that you should create some fuss about it.

Don't get me wrong, Linux gaming would be heaven, but we have to be realistic and keep in mind that current major game engines work with proprietary Microsoft libraries and even hardware manufacturers design video cards for them. It would require a complete change in scenario.

Anyway, a slap in Microsoft's face is welcome, they need to get out of the comfort zone and realise they can't take their main business for granted.
 

Narrator

Honorable
Sep 17, 2013
58
0
10,640
I have always been open to see new operating systems enter the fray. I currently use windows 8 and I dont have many complaints. However, I would not mind giving another OS a try, Especially when it comes to gamng.

With that being Said, Make room for the Fanboys cause this might get ugly!!!
 

Cy-Kill

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2010
232
0
18,690
Oh my, would you look at that, Tom's finally putting out an article around the same time as everyone else, instead of days up to a week later!
 

Narrator

Honorable
Sep 17, 2013
58
0
10,640


I did not see where they mentioned dropping Windows, or did I miss something? Anyway, that of course would be a very bad choice. I think they are just trying to "put their eggs in more than one basket".

 

IAmVortigaunt

Honorable
Mar 7, 2012
102
0
10,680
"Anyway, a slap in Microsoft's face is welcome, they need to get out of the comfort zone and realise they can't take their main business for granted. "

Let me tell you, PC gamers are not their main business...
 

Philippe Leblanc

Honorable
Mar 14, 2013
13
0
10,510
I'm really excited about this. I've always said that Linux would make an excellent platform for gaming and to see a company like Valve push this is fantastic. I think a lot of the skeptics about linux probably think of nexuiz or xonotic as the popular games on this platform and since those games look pretty dated, they feel Linux can't provide a cutting edge experience.

Two problems have hindered cutting edge gaming on Linux: most advanced games rely on directx for one, and second graphics driver support. In this day and age, these problems have pretty much been adressed. Both amd and nvidia have good driver support for linux and if big players like valve throw their weight around, it will get even better. And directx can largely be replaced by opengl. Directx has a few features over opengl, but for the most part you can make some incredible looking games that are probably indistinguishable in quality from their directx counterparts if you use all of opengl's capabilities.

For the most part, Linux can be lighter than windows in ressources, and that means more ressources can be dedicated to running games at higher performance. It's win-win situation for all.
 

stevejnb

Honorable
May 6, 2013
609
0
10,980
Meh, what ever happened to the days when we used to get excited about Valve actually making games rather than getting excited about their next exploit as digital game pimps?
 

JD88

Honorable
Feb 25, 2013
1,424
0
11,660
No one said anything about dropping PC support.

Gabe just knows Windows is quickly losing the "it and it only" factor." I don't know how many people (including myself) have dropped Windows for everything other than for gaming. Ubuntu on the desktop and Chrome OS for on the road for a year and a half haven't looked back since.

A large chunk of China will eventually change to Linux as their government is advocating for a change away from Microsoft. At this point, all Microsoft can hope for is to maintain a decent chunk of market share through enterprise and services just like they are smartly transitioning into. Their days as the only OS in town have come and gone. They only accelerated that process with Win 8.

I'm not sure how Chrome OS is a failure. If I'm not mistaken, just about every OEM announced a new Chromebook just last week. Compared to how many Windows RT releases?

Having said that, Windows has treated me fairly well (cant say the same for all MS products) over the years. I don't wish them any ill will, but it's just the changing of the times. There's just no need for a big overbloated OS like that in the mainstream consumer world.



 


only problem with that is only a small fraction of the gamer community (like us here on Tom's) feel comfortable about using Linux. yeah yeah, I know it's nothing too different or complicated, but a large portion of game sales go to people that'd rather not change their OS. Of course, steam has a lot of data on their user-base, so I guess if Gabe feels like he can move the majority of his customers to Linux, then power to him.

However, let's be realistic, the various hardware companies already have hiccups keeping up with Windows updates and what not. do we think they'll really spend money on supporting all Linux distros? NO!. the only way for this to work is if Steam made their own gaming oriented OS based on Linux. now I can already see enthusiasts complaining about security, privacy, limited freedom, yada yada yada, about this approach lol
 

stevejnb

Honorable
May 6, 2013
609
0
10,980


Actually, I've been curious about something for a while but haven't been willing to take the time to jump in and test it out. A few years ago prior to Skydrive really coming into its own I tried Google docs and generally liked it but eventually stopped using it because of one major factor - the inability to edit .doc files and save as .doc files to Google docs. I was happy enough to use gdocs myself but it became a colossal pain trying to do the format shuffle sending documents to people who were MS Office users. Have they added an ability to use actual .doc files in Google documents yet, or are you still more or less tied to the gdoc format?
 

boogalooelectric

Distinguished
Jul 1, 2009
266
0
18,860


Actually if people are forced to use Linux they can and will, even the noobiest of noobs will. Case in point my wife works for a doctor who hates Microsoft and has complained about them for years. He finally had enough I guess because when two of the other women who work in his office had systems crash (some blue screen apparently) he reloaded them with Ubuntu, since the applications they use are primarily web based. And aside from a little moaning from the women who are using these systems, they are working just great and they are getting their work done.

No this isn't gaming, but it proves that even the noob women who know basically how to turn a computer on and thats about it can learn to use linux.
 

JD88

Honorable
Feb 25, 2013
1,424
0
11,660


It's something Google has been working on since they purchased Quick Office. Currently, a Chromebook is able to do this. I can open a .doc or .docx directly from my drive and it opens into an editor mode. Press save and it saves it. No conversion necessary. This ability is not yet present on any other platform that I am aware of. It might be somehow available in the flags of Chrome beta version I'm not sure. I tested it using some documents that had heavy formatting from MS word such as tables, heading adjustments, color adjustments, etc. They compatibility was impressive. It all looked about the same from what I could tell. Sometimes that stuff gets lost when using the conversion method. I typically just type everything in a new Google Doc but sometimes someone sends me a .docx that needs to be edited slightly and for that it comes in handy. My understanding is that Google plans to implement this into all forms of Docs in the near future.
 

JoseRIII_Ace

Honorable
Sep 18, 2013
1
0
10,510


Wat.
Most Distros are POSIX Compliant
The Linux Standard base exists for this very reason of distro compatibility.
The File Hierarchy Standard exists.
Or if you're really that insistent, a .run binary can pretty much run off of any distro.

Not supporting Distros=/=cannot play steam games. A mere 5 minutes on Youtube and you can see that Gentoo, Slackware, Arch, Fedora, EVEN FreeBSD(Which is not even Linux) have steam clients(and games) running, despite the fact that none are "officially" supported. The whole point of community effort.
 

back_by_demand

Splendid
BANNED
Jul 16, 2009
4,821
0
22,780
Even if 100% of desktop Linux users game on Linux instead of Windows it will still be less than the current number of Steam users, the only way this will fly is on the hope people will drop Windows, but as the vast majority use Windows for things other than gaming I don't see any exodus anytime soon
 

JD88

Honorable
Feb 25, 2013
1,424
0
11,660
I don't think the plan or idea here is to get people to switch from Windows to Linux.

What Valve is doing is making a game console (think PS3 or Xbox) that will be running some form of custom Linux distribution. The idea is that developers will port and develop games for it just like they would any other console. A subsequent result of this will be that those games can also run on PC based Linux as well.
 

taurine

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2010
14
0
18,510
I just don't get all the hype with the Steam Box deal. It seems like a horrible idea to me. Your probably not going to convert console gamers, and people that game on PC's like gaming on PC's, largely because they spend a good amount of money to do so. I don't see the market for this at all.
 

kinggraves

Distinguished
May 14, 2010
951
0
19,010
One of the main differences between a "PC" and a "console" is the OS. A console OS is generally more single task focused, whereas Windows was built for multitasking. The key to a "Steambox" is not the box (hardware) but the OS running that box. Due to Linux's open source nature an OS could be built with it solely to play games, in this case solely to run Steam. With Steam as the only accepted platform the drivers can be specially written by Valve to cooperate with their software. In theory this should be a winning situation for everyone other than MS. Game PCs could skip the Windows license and use an OS that maximizes resources towards the game. Valve would funnel business directly towards Steam as the primary PC gaming platform, cutting down on competition from others selling PC game licenses. Assuring they remain at the top alone is enough to justify having to maintain a full OS instead of a client, and compatibility could be guaranteed by only licensing certain hardware setups for the "Steambox".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.