very low benchmarks in 3Dmark2003 and 2001SE

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

mvriend

Distinguished
Oct 29, 2003
3
0
18,510
I have run 3Dmark2003 and 3Dmark2001SE, the scores were very low. I have got a PIV1.8ghz, 768MB DDR PC2100 and a CLUB3D ATI RADEON 9800. Mainbord is an ASUS P4S533-E with a SIS645DX chipset. Mainbord supports up to 4x AGP.
I have no idea what should be so wrong

Newest IDE and AGP drivers are installed. I have tried ATI and OMEGA drivers. There is nearly no difference between them. Hopefully someone cna help me! Thanks in advance!

3DMark 2003 test results:

General Information

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0b

Mobo Manufacturer

Mobo Model

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x, 2x, 4x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 1816 MHz

FSB 100 MHz

Memory 768 MB


Display Information

Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.96b)

Driver Version 6.14.10.6396

Driver WHQL Certified No

Video Memory 128 MB

Core Clock 324 MHz

Memory Clock 290 MHz


Sound Information

Sound Adapter Driver Name Creative Sound Blaster PCI

Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.1.2535.0


Benchmark Settings

Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Texture Filtering Optimal

Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None

Post Processing false

Vertex Shaders Optimal


Main Test Results
3DMark Score 1760 3DMarks

CPU Score 331.0 CPUMarks


Detailed Test Results


Game Tests

GT1 - Wings of Fury 70.1 fps

GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 7.7 fps

GT3 - Troll's Lair 7.5 fps

GT4 - Mother Nature 15.7 fps


CPU Tests

CPU Test 1 35.9 fps

CPU Test 2 6.1 fps


Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1091.7 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2264.5 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 15.0 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 26.6 fps

Ragtroll 4.2 fps


3DMark 2001SE test results:

System Configuration
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0


Mobo Manufacturer

Mobo Model

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x


CPU Intel Pentium 4 1816 MHz

FSB 100 MHz

Memory 768 MB


Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.96b)

Driver Version 6.14.10.6396

Video Memory 128 MB


Program Version 3DMark2001 SE

Resolution 1024x768 32bit

Texture Format Compressed

FSAA Disabled

Z-Buffer Depth 24bit

Frame Buffer Double

Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L


Detailed Test Results
3DMark Score 7282 3D marks


Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 102.0 FPS

Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 37.3 FPS

Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 132.7 FPS

Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 75.2 FPS

Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 101.5 FPS

Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 49.7 FPS

Game 4 Nature 33.9 FPS


Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1243.2 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2491.4 MTexels/s


High Polygon Count (1 light) 45.6 MTriangels/s

High Polygon Count (8 lights) 14.9 MTriangels/s


Environment Bump Mapping 150.4 FPS

DOT3 Bump Mapping 64.1 FPS


Vertex Shader 50.5 FPS

Pixel Shader 90.8 FPS

Advanced Pixel Shader 71.8 FPS


Point Sprite 5.8 MSprites/s

Thanks,

Marcel
 
In the ATI control panel under D3D, turn off vsync, and turn anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering to "application preference". 03 you should get 5000ish, 01 you should get at least 14000ish. Close any resource hogs running in the background. Oh, and overclock everything!

If this dosn't get you at least close to the scores I've mentioned, well then, I'd shove a stick of dynomite up my ass and kill myself.

SIGNATURE: Stop asking people "whats up" or "hows it goin", you know you don't give a sh*t. And noone cares how you're doing either.

"We are far less than we knew." - Bright Eyes
 
NV Fanboy-
No Will you missed the obvious! He has an ATI card! OMG!!! WTF is he thinking???!!?!11?? BURN the card of D00M now or it will BLOW UP your MONITOR!!11!!!
Click to expand...


My system spec: Fast PC<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7000747" target="_new"> 3D-2001 </A>
"It's not the spoon that bends, it's only yourself."
 
Did you swap out the motherboard without re-installing windows at any point?
HDD got DMA turned on?
HDD sharing a cable with a CDROM?

Has this just started happening, or always been like this?
Have you just replaced the graphics card without un-installing the old drivers?
If not, have you done anything else, hardware-wise or software-wise recently?

[Adding to Speeduk..]
And they cheat!!! Their performance isn't real!!!! THEY JUST LIE IN THE BENCHMARKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
[/Adding to Speeduk..]

---
<font color=red>The preceding text is assembled from information stored in an unreliable organic storage medium. As such it may be innacurate, incomplete, or completely wrong</font color=red> :wink: <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by ChipDeath on 10/29/03 04:54 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
When I disable AA and AF on the control panel i get a score of 4587 in 3Dmark 2003. When I enable 4X AA and disable AF i get a score of 2768.
Is this normal or seems to be something totally wrong? DMA is on, cd is not on same cable as harddisk. Before this ATI RADEON9800 I had a GF4 MX440. I have totaly removed XP so all nvidia drivers were removed.
 
~4500 3DMarks sounds fine. AA and AF both have a pretty large impact on performance.

Don't tell me you think these guys getting 25000 3Dmark2001 scores are running with AA & AF?

What are your 2001SE scores with them both off?



---
<font color=red>The preceding text is assembled from information stored in an unreliable organic storage medium. As such it may be innacurate, incomplete, or completely wrong</font color=red> :wink:
 
Er... um... well, antialiassing and anistropic filtering aren't free, see?

The cost is a huge performance hit.

Otherwise, there wouldn't be an option to turn them on or off, they'd just be on all the time, you know?

------------------
Radeon 9500 (hardmodded to PRO, o/c to 322/322)
AMD AthlonXP 2400+ (o/c to 2600+ with 143 fsb)
3dMark03: 4055
 
I woundn't think so, I get a bit over 11,000 with my rig below and its stock.

btw, I used same resolution too.

It seems to me that there's an option on main screen to select high/low detail. I used low. I can't see on your test results what you used? I believe I ran it both ways and had a pretty good hit on my score when running w/high selected.

Sorry I can't be more specific, but I'm at the office and my rig is at home.

XP 2000+
MSI KT3 ULTRA-2 KT333
Maxtor 60GB ATA 133 7200RPM
512MB PC2700
ABIT G4 Ti4200 OTES 64MB
Win98SE<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Coyote on 10/29/03 05:38 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
hey man your not the only one i've been getting bad scores as well *cries*

and guys if u want to be fanboyistic, do it right

OFCOURSE U GET LOW SCORES! you got a 9800pro here running 3Dmarks 2001 and 2003 we all know 3Dmarks run best on nVidia hardware, you know what? everything run best on nVidia hardware, for HL2 they put in a block in the programming so ONLY nVidia cards can't produce shaders correctly, damn Valve, they got bribe by ATi because ATi's got no other companies supporting them. FX5950Ultra owns 9800XT desprite what you see, all the hardware sites are bribed by ATi, and ATi is run by MOJO, there's no way they could beat nVidia i mean Forceware OWNS Catalyst, i mean who needs to update drivers monthly when u can do it YEARLY, i mean that's just so pro how nVidia's doing it~~
sigh~~ nVidia rules all and ATi sux

RIP Block Heater....HELLO P4~~~~~
120% nVidia Fanboy
bring it fanATics~~ nVidia PWNS all!
SCREW aBOX! LONG LIVE nBOX!!
 
Are you drunken lately? Otherwise all i see in your post lately has been brutal ATi bashing without representing fact.
 
XP2000, R9700 & 512mb RAM gets me 11000-12000 so I would say yeah... if your P4 is a S423 core...

Trust me I know what I'm doing... ooops, grab the cat...
 
Those scores are right inline for your rig, you should never Benchmark with AA or AF on and expect good scores, always run the default settings and make sure AA and AF as well as VSYNC are disabled in the ATI control panel.

"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints."
 
Also, if your so taken with your benchmark scores you need to OC that 9800np you got.

"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints."
 
That's a fairly reasonable score, but the rest of your system is definitely holding your Gfx card back quite a bit. You should find any modern game runs fine though.

Don't worry too much about 3dMarks, they're only a rough estimate compared to 'the real world'. Just play whatever games you like, and if they run ok, then be happy! :smile:

---
<font color=red>The preceding text is assembled from information stored in an unreliable organic storage medium. As such it may be innacurate, incomplete, or completely wrong</font color=red> :wink:
 
oh my god dude, did u see? i said it's a example of nVidia fanboyism -_-

RIP Block Heater....HELLO P4~~~~~
120% nVidia Fanboy
bring it fanATics~~ nVidia PWNS all!
SCREW aBOX! LONG LIVE nBOX!!
 
funny how u didn't catch my sarcasm in there 😛

WHO NEEDS QUANTITY WHEN WE HAVE QUALITY!



RIP Block Heater....HELLO P4~~~~~
120% nVidia Fanboy
bring it fanATics~~ nVidia PWNS all!
SCREW aBOX! LONG LIVE nBOX!!
 
Squirtles knows how to use sarcasm as a literary tool? Holy Crap!@#$

😛

----------
<b>Got any of that beer that has candy floating in it? You know, Skittlebrau? </b> <i>Homer Simpson</i>

TKS
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom