VIA Nano 3000 to Fight Intel's Next Atoms

Status
Not open for further replies.

tipoo

Distinguished
May 4, 2006
1,183
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]zingam[/nom]Monocore atom CPU are suitable only to browse the web or watch youtube "while you make the toilet"... :][/citation]
Making a toilet requires alot of concentration. Using one however...
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
26
I like Via. My netbook is running a C7 (and linux, so lack of power isn't a big concern). When they introduced the Nano I was hoping for a decent selection of new netbooks, but I guess Intel's weaker, but cheaper, Atom was too big of a draw. Of course, my next portable will probably be a more fully-featured laptop, perhaps this new Nano will get me close enough, assuming Intel doesn't just buy off more OEMs. Oops, sorry, according to Tuan, those are market incentives, not payoffs.
 

pbrigido

Distinguished
Mar 6, 2008
529
0
18,980
0
Considering the Atom has to rely on Nvidia's Ion to crunch out 1080P, having a SOC that may be able to perform the function of the Atom and Ion is actually impressive...especially from Via.
 

rooket

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2009
1,097
0
19,280
0
Via? lol why'd I even click on this article. If AMD stepped up to the plate, things would be interesting. Still, competition is good.
 

gsacks

Distinguished
Jul 31, 2008
176
0
18,680
0
Via (and Cyrix before them) have always promised big and delivered meh in the CPU arena. Same goes for the S3 video that accompanies most Via cpus. I had an Via epia motherboard, and it was underwhelming to say the least. I hope they can come through this time. I like pulling for the underdog. But I'll believe it when I see it.
 
G

Guest

Guest
well,it seems they would utterly lose if they don't have a graphics chip integrated on the CPU!

They are going to try to beat the Intel 2chip solution with a VIA 3 chip solition?
 
A little late, but better late than never. It's a shame that VIA hasn't put much into S3 lately. I mean really even the latest chromes they pair with it only have like 4 ROPs and 32 unified shaders. Of course, its still miles better than IGP they pair with the Atom :D.
 

Ehsan w

Distinguished
Aug 23, 2009
463
0
18,790
1
[citation][nom]rooket[/nom]Via? lol why'd I even click on this article. If AMD stepped up to the plate, things would be interesting. Still, competition is good.[/citation]

I don't think AMD has too much money to get into anything else right now....
 

juliom

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2009
84
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]IzzyCraft[/nom]oh VIA how you bring back memorys of my old Pentium D space heater[/citation]

Can't see why it does... Nano is actually a pretty good CPU for it's market.
 

ta152h

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2009
1,207
2
19,285
0
[citation][nom]juliom[/nom]Can't see why it does... Nano is actually a pretty good CPU for it's market.[/citation]

The problem is, what is the market? I got a fanless one, that ran at 800 MHz, and found my 400 MHz, underclocked K6-III+ outperformed it, and ran cooler.

Atom blows it away on low power benchmarks, and once you start moving up, you're often better off with an underclocked Celeron or Pentium based on the Core 2, as you get much better bang for the watt. They're products simply had no real market. They used too much power to compete with Atom well, and you'd have to clock them so low to reach Atom power levels, they couldn't compete in performance. But, once you start getting into where they could beat the Atom, then there was Intel's Core 2 line.

Considering Via is probably exaggerating, as companies always do, it's not clear if this will help them enough. They aren't that far off, so if they got 20% performance and 20% lower power use, they'd be very competitive, but it's probably 5% performance on most benchmarks, and 15% lower power. I don't think Centaur did enough. If it's just a revision, it's still impression. But, if this is their move to 45nm, it's a disappointment. Also, consider they still don't have a DX10 chipset.

On the plus side, the idle draw is down to 100mw, and the ultra low power version is 1.4 GHz instead of 1.3 GHz, so it's progress. But, Atom is improving soon, too. So, we'll have to see. I've always pulled for Centaur since their original Winchips, and thought they had a great idea and would be successful. So far, though, I've been nothing but wrong.
 

Kelavarus

Distinguished
Sep 7, 2009
510
0
18,980
0
AMD already has an offering, the Athlon Neo.

Not sure why it hasn't had an article or anything...

And wth? I'm running one of the Celeron 900 mhz and 1 GB RAM, with Linux Mint, and it's dying. So far I really haven't made ANY OS work decent on here. Irritating.
 

eccentric909

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2006
388
0
18,780
0
[citation][nom]Kelavarus[/nom]AMD already has an offering, the Athlon Neo. Not sure why it hasn't had an article or anything...And wth? I'm running one of the Celeron 900 mhz and 1 GB RAM, with Linux Mint, and it's dying. So far I really haven't made ANY OS work decent on here. Irritating.[/citation]

Toms did do an article on the AMD Athlon Neo, or rather the AMD Congo platform:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/AMD-congo-Ultrathin-Mobile-Platform,8634.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS