VIA Selling S3 Graphics to HTC

Status
Not open for further replies.

vaughn2k

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2008
768
4
19,015
18
[citation][nom]mehrdad_ati[/nom]THEY HAD BOGHT ATI IMAGEON BEFORE ! SO WHY DID THEY NID S3 ?[/citation]
Imageon was discontinued, and not sold...
 
G

Guest

Guest
S3 had some good technologies for the time, it surpassed even some Nvidia cards in 1999-2000. Hope to see some development now!
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
The S3 chips weren't all that bad. Matrox was the undisputed leader, but S3 was a splendid option for anyone still sitting with old isa cards. They lost the fight when the riva and tnt cards arrived, but not before then.
 

palladin9479

Distinguished
Moderator
Jul 26, 2008
3,242
0
20,860
45
S3 actually made some good chips during the TNT times, the Savage 4 was decent with METAL and S3 Texture Compression. Very few games supported METAL though, they opted for the 3DFX Glide and OpenGL standard.

Overall they were a decent "budget" vender back in the day with really good 2D acceleration. Via only bought them for their 2D acceleration tech so that Via could produce all-in-one boards. Same reason they acquired Cyrix. These days none of that is needed so Via just shedding it and letting HTC use it for smartphone / tablet integration.

And yes I would absolutely love to see a Via Nano x2 + Tegra type integrated product.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,079
0
20,810
9
[citation][nom]spookyman[/nom]S3 lost the fight when 3Dfx graphics came out.[/citation]
not really, cause at the beginning 3dfx couldn't stand alone. It needed a 2d card to work. Only with the second generation did it get challenged, and the '16bit only' limitation of voodoo made other options better (despite performing worse). In the end, it was the advent of directx and true 2d and 3d capable graphics cards from ati and nvidia that made the difference. Before then s3 was fine. It had enough memory, and was sufficiently vesa compliant (means almost all dos games would work without needing univesa or anything else).

in short 3dfx might've started the 3d wave, but can't be credited for S3's failure to keep up.
 

kkiddu

Distinguished
Oct 9, 2009
219
0
18,690
1
My motherboard has VIA S3G UniChrome IGP graphics(2004), and it sucks even compared to 2000s Intel's IGPs.

Good riddance, I'll say.
 
S3 graphics have been pretty low end for the last decade. Even though VIA had S3 release dedicated GPUs a little while ago they have been regulated to the low end and set top boxes. Too bad VIA couldn't really capitalize on it. They should have been able to come out with a fusion esk chip well before Intel and AMD if they really wanted.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Surprised no one has made the connection that Husband is CEO of Via and Wife is CEO of HTC. So this isn't really that big of news...
 

OneFXupdude

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2006
8
1
18,510
0
Now that VIA is selling off S3, they may be a better fit with nVidia now. Nvidia has basically been muscled out of the low end, where there is the most profit, by Intel and AMD. That is why they aligned themselves with ARM for phones/tablets. They still have some of the best high end desktop graphics, but I feel they will continue to be pushed further out of the desktop sector unless the become a true third pillar in the computing industry.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Gee, I thought VIA was dead? I remember having a older P3 desktop with a VIA chipset. But it never competed back then and have not heard much from them lately either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS