RolandDeschain
Reputable
Draven35 :
RolandDeschain :
Only Mac hardware recommendations? Are you kidding? This whole misconception that Macs are superior editing machines has GOT to die already. You can get soooooooo much more performance at an equal price for a PC.
Are the guys that wrote this article anti-vaxxers, too?
Are the guys that wrote this article anti-vaxxers, too?
Did you actually read the article? because it pretty much says the same thing regarding editing on Macs that you just did. There are four Windows machines recommended, as opposed to the three Macs, and the top end PC (which, by the way, is supposed to say dual Xeons...) would run circles around the top end Mac, due to some extremely poor system design decisions by Apple.
Yeah, I did. I'm mainly referring to the fact that people glancing at the article come to the Mac-only conclusion because that's what's in their face due to the Apple system advertising you have showing at the bottom of the first page. See what I'm referring to in this screenshot: https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-RSSSORbeR0Q/VPdI11Q_rtI/AAAAAAAAJos/3vYuChuCJpk/w673-h380-no/apple_ad.png
I'd highly recommend reading up on the psychology of the influence that article headlines have on people regardless of what the text of the article actually says. Yes, I know this isn't the "headline", but it's highly noticeable advertising for Macs specifically and only that catches the eye, and considering the nature of the article, I'm guessing you understand what I mean.
Reading on the "headline effect": http://websites.psychology.uwa.edu.au/labs/cogscience/Publications/Ecker.2014IP.JEPA.pdf
http://www.fastcodesign.com/3037742/evidence/misleading-headlines-can-leave-lasting-impressions-even-if-you-read-the-article
In short, I guess what I'm saying is, get rid of the Mac advertising seen in the screenshot, even though I'm assuming that it's automatically showing and not manually placed there based on the content of the article.