VOTW: 3D Music Video Doesn't Require Glasses

[JMcEntegart]

What does 3D without glasses look like, anyway?

VOTW: 3D Music Video Doesn't Require Glasses : Read more

 

[gtvr]

I've seen a lot of music videos that induce headaches and vomiting.

 

[sliem]

What the f**k, it made me dizzy.

 

[RooD]

Call it Seizure and Throw Up... STU 3D

 

[TunaSoda]

"What does 3D without glasses look like, anyway?"
Go outside and look around!

 

[tommysch]

The one frame one frame thing is HORRIBLE!

Plz stop it already with the 3D hype, it sucks.

 

[TunaSoda]

The frame switching should be done at least 16 times a second

 

[Drag0nR1der]

wow, sucky 3d effect, sucky music, and boring video subject matter ... oh, and judging by the comments on youtube, lying about it being novel too. I've always hated the stupid expression 'epic fail' but I'm sorely tempted to use it for this video

 

[Drag0nR1der]

[citation][nom]Drag0nR1der[/nom] ... oh, and judging by the comments on youtube, lying about it being novel too[/citation]

Oops, should have checked my facts firt, those 'other' videos mentioned just use a shaky effect, they dont try to recreate a 3d experience (although this one only 'tries to' rather than succeeds)

 

[mavanhel]

It looks like a really bad horror movie on WAY! too much acid. I couldn't finish the video 'cause it was just terrible and actually hurt my eyes.

 

[Swift_owL]

Don't know why I was expecting more then what I saw that video.

 

[Gin Fushicho]

Couldnt see 3-D anything at all, it was just a screen with frames moving back and forth.

 

[tsnorquist]

If this is the answer to 3D without Glasses, I don't want to know the question.

 

[Trueno07]

I could get the same effect by blinking the left eye then the right eye really fast.

 

[mtyermom]

[citation][nom]mavanhel[/nom]on WAY! too much acid.[/citation]

define 'too much'

 

[jjobaber]

All I see is jittery video that's complete junk.

 

[ktasley]

The idea is actually really good! They just need to make it so fast we cant see it. 120hz alternating frames should do it.

 

[megajynx]

After watching a few times I noticed a few parts of the video ALMOST portrayed a sense of three dimensions similar to the 3DTVs they have on display at BestBuy... after of course a series of eye aches, migraines, compulsive vomiting, a half a bottle of Peptol, a nap, more migraines, and some earplugs.

 

[Bolbi]

Close... But the frames were slow enough that I didn't get a complete sense of 3D. The one thing it did succeed in doing is making someone who has never been motion-sick before nauseous!

 

[counselmancl]

You can interpolate a 2d image that when viewed with a focus point either in front of or behind the actual image, an actual 3d picture emerges. This is the concept behind the magic eye pictures that were a fad fifteen years ago. That concept could work for moving 3d pictures. I'm not sure if you would have to use a random dot type system or if you could somehow use real video frames. Also, stereoscopic pictures can be viewed in 3d without the viewer using the same method to view the magic eye photos.

I'm not sure if those techniques would take off or not because it would require training the eye to do something unnatural, but that is a way to get 3d images on current technology without any extra equipment.

 

[hallock]

I'm sick

 

[domenic]

Have there been any studies on long term affect of 3D on the mind? What about developing minds and eyes?

 

[zachary k]

i can see the 3D, but i don't like it.

 

[Guest]

DAMN that hurts the shit out of my head!!!!

 

[FunYun]

Ugh, this the first time I have ever had a video give me a headache.

Some of the scenes do look 3D, maybe with a higher framrate it would look better.