Warning: wall of text incoming. tl;dr version at the bottom.
DerTyp2 :
@FD2Raptor
Ty for telling me that the cooler won't work. It seems to be coolest and most quiet cooler, but I don't know. Can you recommend me another one?
I'd really like to take the case because it seems to be very good. The 2 fans which are included seem to be good, it's quiet, easy to build in and has led lmao
About the motherboard, I've heard that asrock is a pretty bad company. Like a sister company of Asus, but building shitty budget things so they are in a different market, but I don't know tbh.
With ASROCK, basically just avoid the most basic & cut-down version from their line-up. From mid to high-end stuff, they're fine. ex: their top-of-the-line Z270 SuperCarrier can hold an i5 7600k @ 4.8Ghz with just 1.15V Vcore through an Intel Burn Test.
As for cooler that fit and can do the job well while being not too noisy:
be quiet! PURE ROCK or
Cryorig H7.
DerTyp2 :
The Asus GTX also seems to be the fastest of the GTX's.
Why should I take the RX480? I thought the GTX 1060 is allot better.
The GTX 1060 has better performance/watt; while the RX 480, often being priced quite lower, have better performance/$.
The GTX 1060 is better than a RX 480, but it's not 80€ better, which is why the RX 480 has the better price/performance.
Really though, with nVIDIA tightened control of this generation card, all GTX1060 perform about the same; so long that it's not too hot where you are, all twin/triple fans GTX 1060 would do a fine job keeping the card from being heat-throttled and therefore, again, keeping performance about the same.
Personally, I'd say the
Sapphire R9 Fury 4GB HBM for roughly 300€ would have been the best performance/price wise. Seeing that the GTX1060/RX480 only trades blow with the GTX 970 while the Fury would be coming at GTX980 Ti tier.
But the Fury high power consumption and the untested nature of the FSP Hydro Bronze (and that it has only 38A/456W on its 12V rail) make me feel reserved about making that recommendation (Fury could consume ~250-300W under load, and an overclocked i5k could also get to a maximum of ~100W, making it pretty uncomfortable combo to use with the Hydro 500W).
DerTyp2 :
Why should I w8 for them? Shouldn't you take nvida and Intel for better performance?
Basically, AMD is poised to release their latest CPU, the Ryzen 1800x/1700x/1700 (on March 2nd); all three are 8 cores 16 threads with the 1700 being priced at around where an 4 cores 8 threads i7 would be. That together with the fact that early benchmark (albeit supplied mostly by AMD, I believe) suggested that AMD has managed to close in on Intel with regards to single core performance and power consumption.
This make the tech watchers feel that if everything line up right, Intel may have to respond, and one of the way for Intel to respond was to cut prices to compete (some optimist suggest that the AMD Ryzen 4c/8t may go into sub $200 range and would cause serious trouble for the 4c/4t i5).
Which is why people who are thinking of higher budget and is not in a hurry to get a new build right now are generally recommended to wait until Ryzen, its benchmark & review are released (and the expected Intel response) before committing their money.
Especially now that you've expressed that the computer's purpose is for:
graphic design, some games, sometimes a little of video editing and maybe sometimes streaming.
Which is where Ryzen may very well excel at, and cause a disruption in pricing soon.
tl;dr :
- ASROCK MB is fine from their midrange or higher.
- Cooler that fit, is not noisy, and can cool decently: Cryorig H7 and be quiet! Pure Rock.
- GTX 1060 while better than RX 480, it's not 80€ better.
- Now, knowing your intended workload for the PC, it is highly recommended that you delay this build if possible, because you may very well stand to benefits greatly from waiting until after Ryzen are released.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram