web site maps for CA fixed

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Santa Barbara & San Luis Obispo, CA now have their own coverage maps
instead of mistakenly being linked to the Los Angeles maps. Thanks to
Frank Harris for notifing sprint about this problem.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

They may show Santa Barabra, but the maps are still way too small scale and
brush over **known** deadspots.

SprintPCS and other carriers still ignore their own indistries "Consumer Code",
and invite dissatisfied customers by having maps drawn by their marketing
departments thatomit holes in ocverage.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040518071136.10326.00001737@mb-m03.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
>
> SprintPCS and other carriers still ignore their own indistries "Consumer Code",
> and invite dissatisfied customers by having maps drawn by their marketing
> departments thatomit holes in ocverage.
>
>

Such a map as you expect is physically impossible, Phill. But you've
been told before, and you simply cease to discuss it.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Such a map as you expect is physically impossible,

Thats new lame excuse.

The current maps are basicly lies. They are too small a scall to use, and they
paint over known dead zones. Both of which **ARE** physically possible to
include on a map.

But that might be customer friendly.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040519082106.22589.00000799@mb-m29.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
> The current maps are basicly lies. They are too small a scall to use, and they
> paint over known dead zones. Both of which **ARE** physically possible to
> include on a map.
>

Not at the level you expect, Phill. You expect block-level detail.
And that's not physically possible. Coverage at that small a scale
can change, and pretty radically, within 24 hours. For something
like that, we have to rely on customer reports.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> You expect block-level detail.

Thank you for proving yoiu are the LIAr in trying to apologize for Sprint PCS
and its unacceptable maps.

You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you can't
I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.

All I ask is that known dead zones. Like Little Elm Texas be represented.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
>
> You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you can't
> I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.
>

Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY Phillip? You lied about me and
misquoted a posting where you attributed all the foul language to me and
not a single word of it was mine ... and you NEVER APOLOGIZED. That
indeed makes you a hypocrite on a very grand scale indeed!

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAq7cn1p0e3NXsrtERAuO+AKCq9mhiDveRIZ3Thi99ktDja7TKMgCfUc1Z
gG90S1T58Zv9F0WXXzNHQiY=
=OVwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040519135537.05832.00001474@mb-m03.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
> You find me a post where I asked for block level detail.
>

Time and again, Phill, you've responded to people with specific
address complaints that the maps are inadequate. What inference
should one draw from that if *not* a demand for block-level detail?

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:40abb728$0$166$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
> >
> > You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you
can't
> > I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.
> >
>
> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY Phillip? You lied about me and
> misquoted a posting where you attributed all the foul language to me and
> not a single word of it was mine ... and you NEVER APOLOGIZED. That
> indeed makes you a hypocrite on a very grand scale indeed!

My sentiments as well ... He's done all that ... and more to yours truly ...

Bob

 

[Nebby]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY

When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
acceptable.

They are too small scale (i.e. 1" = 50 miles) and
paint over known dead zones.

 

[Nebby]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Time and again, you've responded to people with
> specific address complaints that the maps are
> inadequate. What inference should one draw from > that if *not* a demand for
block-level detail?

Someone asking for known deadzones in Houston or
New York City is a little different some saying maps paint over known deadzones
and are inadequate.
AGAIN you find a post where I said maps should be at block level detail...
You can't...
So you invent a phoney conclusion.

Rob J vargas. The disgrace of SPrint PCS



I have some extra email to write today.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
>> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY
>
> When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
> acceptable.
>
> They are too small scale (i.e. 1" = 50 miles) and
> paint over known dead zones.

So, you can't apologize for something you did and you expect somebody
else to apologize for something that they didn't do? Good one pea
brain.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFArMEZ1p0e3NXsrtERAh6KAKClUM5O/ndP+uIG6XceLsMG9HwWYwCeNk64
siPj3W6Ia/Tmo1zT7kdx2VI=
=GVpv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040520073133.27424.00000991@mb-m24.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.compants says...
> When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
> acceptable.
>

Which is *not* what is being said, Phill.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them