[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]I'm sure regardless that the images will be somehow compressed (even if they be close to lossless compression, or 20Mbit Mpeg 2/4) in any possible future release of a cam like this.It seems silly to waste precious bandwidth, but makes more sense to have that extra 10ms delay, and a 2-8x compression going on.[/citation]
No, because as I mentioned in the first post, it is designed for machine-vision applications. You don't want to add latency, waste CPU cycles on compression and decompression, or add compression artifacts to your images in that situation.
It does "show off" USB 3.0, but they didn't do it just because they thought it would be neat-o, they did it to find out if USB 3.0 could actually be a viable machine-vision camera interface other than Firewire or Camera Link.