I currently have a
Ryzen 3600
MSI Edge x570 wifi
Saphire RX580
I recently viewed user benchmark website and it said i5 9600kf was in their 17th position in terms of speed not price ect. They also have my 3600 at 77th place so I assumed the intel was alot faster for games and desktop as I don't do video editing ect. But as I read reviews online and your forum I notice its not that much faster in games and quite a bit slower in business applications so the extra speed I was supposed to get doesn't seem to justify sacrificing the other abilities of the 3600. Are they right that it is that much faster in games and desktop or is my reading more the truth that there is only a slight difference. I ordered as follows the I5 9600kf and MSI MAG Z390 Tomahawk . the RX 580 will remain as main GPU. Would it be better to keep the intel or AMD? Would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks.
Ryzen 3600
MSI Edge x570 wifi
Saphire RX580
I recently viewed user benchmark website and it said i5 9600kf was in their 17th position in terms of speed not price ect. They also have my 3600 at 77th place so I assumed the intel was alot faster for games and desktop as I don't do video editing ect. But as I read reviews online and your forum I notice its not that much faster in games and quite a bit slower in business applications so the extra speed I was supposed to get doesn't seem to justify sacrificing the other abilities of the 3600. Are they right that it is that much faster in games and desktop or is my reading more the truth that there is only a slight difference. I ordered as follows the I5 9600kf and MSI MAG Z390 Tomahawk . the RX 580 will remain as main GPU. Would it be better to keep the intel or AMD? Would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks.