L ladic Distinguished Jun 19, 2003 403 0 18,780 Jul 16, 2005 #1 2400 is 2 Ghz 2500 is 1.8 Ghz but has double the Cache WHich is better for game? more Ghz or more Cache? I have both chips, I just want to know which to put on my main PC.
2400 is 2 Ghz 2500 is 1.8 Ghz but has double the Cache WHich is better for game? more Ghz or more Cache? I have both chips, I just want to know which to put on my main PC.
K8MAN Distinguished Apr 1, 2005 839 0 18,980 Jul 17, 2005 #2 they will probably be very similar but the 2500+ has a lot of potential if u o/c it. The know-most-of-it-all formally known as BOBSHACK<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by K8man on 07/16/05 06:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
they will probably be very similar but the 2500+ has a lot of potential if u o/c it. The know-most-of-it-all formally known as BOBSHACK<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by K8man on 07/16/05 06:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
L ladic Distinguished Jun 19, 2003 403 0 18,780 Jul 17, 2005 #3 I don't overclock. They are about 1.5-2 years old. So there wont be any noticeable diff between either?
I don't overclock. They are about 1.5-2 years old. So there wont be any noticeable diff between either?
liquidpaper007 Distinguished Jun 7, 2005 402 0 18,780 Jul 17, 2005 #4 benchmark them <A HREF="http://www.futuremark.com" target="_new">http://www.futuremark.com</A>
K8MAN Distinguished Apr 1, 2005 839 0 18,980 Jul 18, 2005 #5 the 2400+ will be slightly faster for most things but since u already have the chips why not try o/cing the 2500+ to see how easy it is. Its basically a one-time deal and forget it. The know-most-of-it-all formally known as BOBSHACK
the 2400+ will be slightly faster for most things but since u already have the chips why not try o/cing the 2500+ to see how easy it is. Its basically a one-time deal and forget it. The know-most-of-it-all formally known as BOBSHACK