What is everybody's score in 3dmark 2003:

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
:evil:
Using 3dmark 2003 3.1.4
- My system is this:

Intel Pentium 4 Processor 2.0GHz
256 mb of ddr266 ram
Nvidia geforce fx 5200 64mb ddr agp4x
Windows XP Professional

Running at 1024*768 and 32-bit color (no AA)

My score is:

1070 (pretty low isn't it?)

so can i get some scores from anyone who've used 3dmark 2003, better if the resolution is also 1024*768. :evil:

<font color=blue>
My computer is <b>sooo fast</b>,
It finished <b>SETI</b> in <b>10 seconds.</b>
<font color=blue>
 

davepermen

Distinguished
Sep 7, 2002
386
0
18,780
i have about 5000 or so on a p4 2.4gig, no ht, no fsb800, and radeon9700pro, 9 months old..

quite fine i do feel..

thought, at home i have about 1000 less because of the celeron, or the motherboard.. :(

"take a look around" - limp bizkit

www.google.com
 

Caimbeul

Distinguished
Jul 4, 2003
378
0
18,790
Jm was that with your new card? 5200 wasnt it?

I myself recently Scored 72,663 whilst running multiple SETI sessions ;-P

Back to the real world: On build 330 I scored 1469 on the system below, aditional info = 2xSeagate Barracuda's @ 7,200rpm with hardly any room on eihter. Dual Channel mode for the PC2700 DDR. Bios setings set to agressive all round, memory running @ 5,2,2,2 (i think) The only thing Overclocked is my Ti4200 and I cant remember what i clocked it to but it wasnt that high.

Anyone know if this is any good?

<i>Mmm Dawn AND Eve at the same time...Drroooooll
-------------------------------------------------
<b>XP2100+, 1Gb RAM, ASUS A7N8X, PNY 64Mb Ti4200. :cool:
 

jihiggs

Splendid
Oct 11, 2001
5,821
2
25,780
i got 3200 i believe. that was with an xp 1700 radeon 9500pro 512 megs ram. dont know what res it was, whatever the free version defaults to.

wpdclan.com cs game server - 69.12.5.119:27015
 

TheMASK

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2003
1,510
0
19,780
A7V8X, 1700+ OCd to 2800+, 1*512MB DDR400 @ 190FSB, ASUS GF4 MX440 64MB 4X

3D Mark 03 score : <b>297</b>

<font color=blue>Just be </font color=blue><font color=red><b>ABU</b></font color=red> - <b><font color=red>A</b></font color=red><font color=blue>lways</font color=blue> <b><font color=red>B</b></font color=red><font color=blue>e</font color=blue> <b><font color=red>U</b></font color=red><font color=blue>seful<b>!</b></font color=blue>
 

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
I get 2312 3d marks. This was a while ago, before cat 3.4, and the new patch for 3d mark came out to stop Nvidia from cheating.

My system:
celeron 1.1 @ 1.4ghz
512 megs of pc 133
epox 3vsa2 mb using the via apollo Pro 133T
Radeon 9600Pro
30 gig 7200 rpm WD with 2mb cache
Sound blaster Audigy
 

vacs

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2002
239
0
18,680
6343

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1099532" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1099532</A>
 

Jake75

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2001
2,770
0
20,780
I got 750 or so with my XP1600, GeForce4Ti4200, 512PC2100...I've been told I should get at least twice as much but I'm to lazy to 'mess' around and try to localize the 'error'

And I'm only playing Medal Of Honor anyway :smile:

<font color=blue>Youth is wasted on the young</font color=blue>
 

noko

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2001
2,414
1
19,785
Default driver settings, looped 3 times, overclocked Tyan Tachyon G9700Pro, default 3dMark2003 settings:

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1149175" target="_new">6149</A>
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
did someone here get more than 4ofps in that nature test?

<font color=blue>
My computer is <b>sooo fast</b>,
It finished <b>SETI</b> in <b>10 seconds.</b>
<font color=blue>
 

phsstpok

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
5,600
1
25,780
D*mn, I've got to get a 9600Pro!

2312 is a nice score for a Socket370 Celeron system w/ SDRAM!

What score do you get for 3DMark2001?

<b>56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!</b>
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
My score is 814.

System specs:

Duron 1 GHz @ 1.15 GHz (230 MHz FSB)
ABIT NF7 v2.0
128 MB PC1840 DDR RAM 2.0-2-2-5
Gigabyte Radeon 9000 (64 MB, non-Pro)

I'm using only 128 MB RAM, otherwise I would get ~1000

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
i know i can get over 1400 if i disable some of my programs running in the background while benchmarking.

<font color=blue>
My computer is <b>sooo fast</b>,
It finished <b>SETI</b> in <b>10 seconds.</b>
<font color=blue>
 

Willamette_sucks

Distinguished
Feb 24, 2002
1,940
0
19,780
Highest score evar was about 6650. (3.4s, closed all unneccessary apps, same specs as below)

With the 3.6s and build 330 I routinely get ~6600. I don't think I get over 40fps av. in the Nature test, I'll check when I get home. I think its like 36.

A7n8x rev. 2, 2700+ @ 12x200, 2x256mb xms3500 sync w/fsb at 5-2-2-2, all aggressive settings, 128mb 9800 Pro at 460/380.
Fastwrites + sideband addressing ON (you losers), shadowing options ON! (losers).


"Mice eat cheese." - Modest Mouse

"Every Day is the Right Day." -Pink Floyd<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Willamette_Sucks on 08/21/03 12:29 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
For 3d Mark 2001 I get 7137.
Not too bad I suppose considering my system. The 9600 Pro was a nice little jump from my old video card, a geforce 4 mx 440 :redface:
 

phsstpok

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
5,600
1
25,780
Now I really do want a 9600 PRO (or 9500 PRO).

I'm getting 9130 in 3DMark2001. You get 7130. However, I only get 1344 in 3DMark2003 while you get 2312.

Now since you have a Celeron @1.4 and I have a Tbred @2.1 it looks to me that I could get big gains upgrading my 8500 to a 9600Pro. We both have SDRAM platforms so I think my Tbred @2.1 should yield even higher performance when using equal video cards. I hope it should, anyway.

<b>56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!</b>
 

speeduk

Distinguished
Feb 20, 2003
1,476
0
19,280
5000 on a 9500np ???? Hmmm faster than my 9700pro at stock speeds on my 2436mhz barton @ 203mhz fsb :/ Oh wait im using omega drivers, that took about 200 marks off my score from cat 3.4's but still thats a good score!

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6884109" target="_new"> MY RIG </A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1150155" target="_new"> 3D-03 </A>
<font color=red> 120% overclocker </font color=red> (cheapskate)
 

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
Yes, you really should get a 9600Pro (or 9500Pro) :smile: . I imagine you would see some pretty nice improvements with your setup. I know I did when I upgraded from my geforce 4 mx 440 card. Man, that card sucked. I know my processor is bottlenecking my graphics card, but I needed something better than my mx 440.
 

lhgpoobaa

Illustrious
Dec 31, 2007
14,462
1
40,780
Bah. Who cares about 3dSchlongStroke? Go play some game!

<b>My Car comes with Hyper Threading enabled:
1970 General Motors Holden HT Kingswood Wagon :smile:
Regards,
Mr no integrity coward.</b>
 

GeneticWeapon

Splendid
Jan 13, 2003
5,795
0
25,780
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=932041" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=932041</A>
:smile:

I <b>help</b> because <b>you</b> suck.
<b>Play Raven Shield</b>