I read the recent Z68 article where Tom's displays using an SSD a cache for as much larger HDD.
Now, I don't dispute that SSD Caching increases the drive's theoretical performance..
But I am wondering what kind of things you'd have to have your HDD to see any real-world difference.
Personally, I have a 256GB C300 (hoping for 512GB RAID 0 soon) and so I keep all my programs and games on it.
I only use my HDD array (8TB RAID 0) for housing my media, such as FLAC audio, my photography and movies with I legally rip from my collection of Blu-rays for quick playback.
I don't think there would be a difference in performance when opening a simple audio file..
And on the opposite end, there's no way a 30GB drive could contain my 40-50GB BD rips, nor my Gigapixels photography.
So, I don't understand what this feature is good for, if anything, besides simply making the HDD faster on paper.
I'd appreciate any input!
Now, I don't dispute that SSD Caching increases the drive's theoretical performance..
But I am wondering what kind of things you'd have to have your HDD to see any real-world difference.
Personally, I have a 256GB C300 (hoping for 512GB RAID 0 soon) and so I keep all my programs and games on it.
I only use my HDD array (8TB RAID 0) for housing my media, such as FLAC audio, my photography and movies with I legally rip from my collection of Blu-rays for quick playback.
I don't think there would be a difference in performance when opening a simple audio file..
And on the opposite end, there's no way a 30GB drive could contain my 40-50GB BD rips, nor my Gigapixels photography.
So, I don't understand what this feature is good for, if anything, besides simply making the HDD faster on paper.
I'd appreciate any input!
