Actually, the answer to this is the Ryzen 3500/X: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-5-3500-price-release-date,40522.htmlWhat is the AMD equivalent of a i5 9600K ? or any i5 processor
compared to intel 9600K, is there a minor or major difference in performanceryzen 5 3600x
Depends on the program. In 6 or less threads i'd be really close(assuming both cpus are not starved for memory bandwidth and have good cooling for boost speeds), but with more threads the 3600x will start pulling ahead.compared to intel 9600K, is there a minor or major difference in performance
Actually, the answer to this is the Ryzen 3500/X: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-5-3500-price-release-date,40522.htmlWhat is the AMD equivalent of a i5 9600K ? or any i5 processor
According to the site you provided, the Ryzen 5 3500X is much better than i5 9400FActually, the answer to this is the Ryzen 3500/X: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/ryzen-5-3500-price-release-date,40522.html
The problem is availability.
I guess one could just take the 3600/X and disable SMT...
Yea. Question. Why do people consider intel processors to be better than amd ones?Eh?
Wasn't this about the 9600K though? The 3500/X at least matches the 9600K in core/thread count.
1)Blind brand loyalty.Yea. Question. Why do people consider intel processors to be better than amd ones?