F Firewind Distinguished Oct 8, 2006 31 0 18,530 Jan 31, 2007 #1 For non-overclocking and overclocking? I'm looking for stability and performance.
BaronMatrix Splendid Dec 14, 2005 6,655 0 25,790 Jan 31, 2007 #2 For non-overclocking and overclocking? I'm looking for stability and performance. Click to expand... I'd go for DDR2 667. It's the sweet spot for OC and regular use.
For non-overclocking and overclocking? I'm looking for stability and performance. Click to expand... I'd go for DDR2 667. It's the sweet spot for OC and regular use.
C crackdlr Distinguished Aug 6, 2006 55 0 18,630 Jan 31, 2007 #3 i hear this kind comes highly regarded - stable and fast when not overclocking (low timings) - and good for overclocking since it's rated up to ddr2 800 G.SKILL 1GB 240-Pin DDR2 800 mostly for the timings 4-4-4-12 and the price $114 for 1 gb http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16820231088 $214 for 2 gb http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820231087
i hear this kind comes highly regarded - stable and fast when not overclocking (low timings) - and good for overclocking since it's rated up to ddr2 800 G.SKILL 1GB 240-Pin DDR2 800 mostly for the timings 4-4-4-12 and the price $114 for 1 gb http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16820231088 $214 for 2 gb http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820231087
F Firewind Distinguished Oct 8, 2006 31 0 18,530 Jan 31, 2007 #4 So the DDR2 800 with CAS 4 or less timings would be advisable I take it? What's this about 939 counterparts doing better? (computer newbie)
So the DDR2 800 with CAS 4 or less timings would be advisable I take it? What's this about 939 counterparts doing better? (computer newbie)