What We Learned About the Future of Laptops at CES 2019

Giroro

Honorable
Jan 22, 2015
648
103
11,190
13
"CEO Jensen Huang announced that the company’s RTX GPUs will work to to accelerate 3D modeling and animation programs, edit 6K video (8K video on desktops) and broadcast pro-quality streaming from a single PC."

So Nvidia announced that their GPUs... are GPUs, and also that you can use them to do normal GPU things.

That's good to know. I was actually worried the RTX line is so focused on turning specialized enterprise features into useless gimmicks that they might cut Graphics Processing out of their laptop chips entirely.
 

Tanyac

Reputable
Aug 30, 2014
745
8
5,415
153
The problems with laptops is (a) cooling, (b) speed and (c) ease of upgrade/expandability and (d) cost.

Almost no laptops come with NVme drives because of heat. I have an Acer laptop in which I put a Samsung NVMe drive. It throttles constantly causing program freezes crashes and lagging. SATA so far has been the only "recommended" drive.... so slow!

The HDDs are also poor performers. 5400 RPM. The reason I put a Samsung NVMe drive in my laptop was because it took nearly 5 minutes to become fully booted up and usable with Windows 10 Pro. Granted, it had all the Manufacturers bloatware installed, but that is still abysmal.

The cost of laptops here have increased by almost 40% in the last year. I expect they will increase by at least another 60% in 2019 due to memory, graphics, SSD and other shortages. CPUs possibly too...

My laptop cost me $1299 in January 2017. It's now $1799 for the same one.

A half-decent 17" laptop here will set you back $4000 AUD. I can build a far more superior performing desktop for 25% less than that with a 27" monitor that will run much cooler and be snappier and more responsive than a laptop.

Your upgrade options are extremely limited in laptops. Maybe a little extra memory, maybe a bigger hard drive, not much else. Not happy with your laptop? You can't just upgrade it an save on cost like you can with a desktop; you're up for major replacement cost. And selling second hand.. People want stuff for 10% of the purchase cost. A $2000 laptop will be lucky to get you $200 after 12 months.

For school and business work laptops are great. I don't see them as being "serious" gaming systems for quite some time, and never will they be affordable in Australia even if they do make the grade. Cooling is ALWAYS going to be an issue, which hinders how far manufacturers can push them.

I know I'm going to get down voted for this, but the "oooh... laptops are the thing right now, I've got to have one" mentality is just insane.
 

Nintendork

Distinguished
Dec 22, 2008
464
0
18,780
0
Dunno why they talk about the future of laptops when "new models" are still stuck with the horrible 16:9 aspect ratio. THAT IS FINE FOR TV's.

Just see how many unused space is on that Asus Desktop replacement, portable AIO.
 

What wasted space? That space is there to keep the screen at a somewhat more ergonomic height, so that you're not having to look down near your hands. That Rog Mothership with the detachable keyboard actually seems like an interesting design for things like gaming, so that one doesn't have to crane their wrists in weird ways if they want to stay centered with the screen while gaming with the keyboard and a mouse. It's absolutely massive for a portable computer though, and probably not something most people would want to regularly carry with them anywhere.

As for aspect ratios, for things like gaming and watching video, some of the primary tasks a system like this will be used for, a 16:9 aspect ratio makes the most sense. Games have been designed primarily for widescreen formats for at least the last decade. Using a 4:3 screen, for example, will typically result in either your horizontal field of view getting cut off, or everything getting shrunk to fit a 16:9 area of the screen with blank borders to the top and bottom. The same goes for videos, where most modern video content is in a 16:9 or wider format. Perhaps a less-elongated aspect ratio could potentially be better for browsing the web or working on documents, but you don't buy a bulky gaming laptop with high-end graphics hardware for purposes like that.
 

bigdragon

Distinguished
Oct 19, 2011
573
38
19,010
0
I have a 2-year old 2-in-1 with a quad core CPU, 1050 graphics, Wacom AES pen, NVME SSD, and 15" 4k display. I'm not ready to replace it, but I am disturbed that 2-in-1 machines appear to be regressing in performance while increasing in price. CES has left me concerned about the future of the 2-in-1 form factor. OEMs need to stop ignoring the need for performance improvements.

Intel's Project Athena is terrifying. Remember when they did the same thing with Ultrabooks and Netbooks? Intel specified CPUs, screen sizes, RAM, storage drives, and even keyboard layouts resulting in a market of identical products with slightly different styling. Asus produced a Netbook called the 1201N -- a dual core Atom with Hyperthreading, 12" display, and Nvidia graphics...something Intel did not want coming to market and heavily penalized with a huge hardware price markup. The 1201N played Crysis on the go for me! Ultrabooks couldn't even manage that! Amazing machine that almost didn't get built.
 

mathew7

Distinguished
Jun 3, 2011
292
0
18,860
27
Sooo...where's my 13" with 1050 and 100+Hz? Preferably Thinkpad (and not the bigger-than-14" Alienware 13....I dismissed that 2 years ago). Closest choices for me are Razer Blade Stealth and Thinkpad T480 (both with 25W MX150, but 60Hz panels).
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS