What's faster: Atom 2.13GHz Dual-core VS. Celeron 2.0GHz quad-core

phenomenia

Reputable
Aug 10, 2015
1
0
4,510
Hello,

I'm looking for a new NAS to run several JAVA websites on (Atlassian Jira, Stash, Confluence).
Currently I own a NAS (Qnap TS269) with an Intel® Atom™ 2.13GHz Dual-core Processor and 3 GB Ram. The web systems are running ok but a bit slow. Now I'm looking at a new NAS (Qnap TS453 Pro) which has an Intel® Celeron® 2.0GHz quad-core processor and can be upgraded to 16GB.

I expect it to bring a big difference in performance but I'm not tec enough to be sure.

Any thought from you guys?

Thanks in advance!
 
Although The Celeron Is An Older Chip Its A Fully Fledged Computer Chip, Meaning It Will Be Able To Handle Alot More. Whereas The Atom Is Designed For Small And Not Very Powerful Computers/Nucs And Even Tablets, Hence It Being Slower And Being Able To Cope With A Bigger Load.

The 4 Core Celeron Will Also Be Able To Perform Multiple Different Applications At Once, Although Will Not Stack To Create 1 Powerful Core If Needed As No Hyper-threading Is Enabled On Celerons.

In My Opinion The Celeron Will Be An Upgrade To Your Atom.
 


Although you are correct, please don't capitalize every word.

 
Sure the Celeron quad core is better in a wide range especially the new generations where Intel Atom D2700 @ 2.13GHz had PassMark score of a 839 where Intel Celeron B840 @ 1.90GHz duel core had a score of 1784