This isn't a facetious question. I have never found the appeal of VSync or even non-buffered sync solutions. When I gamed at 60Hz, I got over 60fps almost all the time by a large enough margin (~90fps) so that screen tearing was barely noticeable in any games. Then when gaming at 144Hz with a better PC, screen tearing at 100-144fps is simply not noticeable to me. For fps over 144, there's definitely no noticeable screen tearing. So with that, I'm really lost with why G-Sync is good at all? It seems to me to be a premium feature that costs more (maybe not so much true in 2019), but is only good for sub 60Hz gaming... which means you should just invest in better hardware not a monitor to accommodate bad fps. Am I looking at this the wrong way?