which cpu, amd 64 or P4?

Brandon73

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2004
5
0
18,510
I was wondering if someone could help me in picking out a new CPU. I did read the CPU guide but was wondering if things are different now that AMD dropped prices (and Intel will soon follow). I can't decide between an Athlon 64 3000+ or a P4 3.0Ghz. Also is it worth the extra money to get the A64 3200+ with the increased cache size. I'm not really any kind of gamer but I do video editing and decoding. I'm not a big hurry either, just want the "most bang for the buck". Thanks
 

BeyRevRa

Distinguished
Jul 29, 2004
183
0
18,680
I was actually facing the same dilemma myself and it came down to the fact that athlon 64 are AMD's next generation chip and the P4s, at least in the socket they are in now, are going to most likely be phased out in favor of Intel's next generation chips. That in mind, getting an AMD 64 would most likely be better in the long run because it won't be out-dated as fast and upgrading in the future will be easy because you won't have to start completely from scratch (new mobo). Just my take on it, I'm probably wrong though.
 

darkhorseporter

Distinguished
Jul 26, 2004
38
0
18,530
the P4 is supposed to be better for audio/video encoding, but the Athlon 64 does appear to be more future-proof. I would go AMD, but I am an AMD fanboy, so I am biased :)
 

Cybercraig

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,058
0
19,780
Both are poor choices at this point.

Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4 - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - THAT'S MORE LIKE IT!
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
Get P4 3.0C GHz

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>
 

P4Man

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2004
2,305
0
19,780
You'll probably be happy with either, both have their pro's and con's, for instance P4 is pretty damn good at DivX, A64 shines on XviD. Both are roughly equal on Quicktime and Aftereffects. P4 has hyperthreading going for it (nice for long rendering jobs in the background), A64 has its 64 abilities and unleashed performance going for it if you plan to hang on to your machine long enough to witness the 64 bit Windows launch.

I'd probably get a P4 if the expected lifetime of the machine is not much more than ~1.5 years before a major upgrade. IF you intend to hang on to it longer, I'd opt for the A64, but again, I don't think either one will really disapoint you.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
 

JJKP77

Distinguished
Jul 26, 2004
22
0
18,510
my take on it.
Windows will be releasing 64 bit windows.
Once released companies will start the big switch
to 64 bit windows and support will grow less
and less for 32 bit windows. Thus the support
for your p4 will diminish and diminish further.
The support for your Athlon 64 looks good for the next 5 years,
or longer. hell 64 bit Win won't even be released till at least next
spring and a 4 year life span is average for a windows OS.
I think your best bet is to get an expensive MOBO thats tricked out
to max current specs for the Athlon64 and Memory Mhz; get a cheap sempron or 2800+;
and in so doing leave yourself plenty of headroom for Proc upgrades on the 64 line.
Otherwise you're tossing the P4 setup completely when you upgrade to
the Win64 OS. I hope that helps you determine your best
bang for the buck. Quick thought. Make sure the MOBO has at least 3Gb max
memory and look for 4Gb max Memory. It'll pay off in the long run.

AMD Athlon XP 2100+-=-1Gb PC2700-=-40Gb WDD HDD-=-
16x DvD-=-32x12x40 Lite on CD/RW-=-Floppy, "Who needs a damned floppy!"-=-ECS K7S5A Pro-=- Geforce 4 Ti 4400 128Mb 4x-=-
 

peteroy

Distinguished
BANNED
Jun 14, 2004
280
0
18,790
I would go Intel, I don't trust AMD.


===========================
<A HREF="http://www.clan-chaos.com" target="_new">clan CHAOS</A>
 

Kanavit

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2004
390
0
18,780
yes, go Intel. can't lose with Intel. they don't lose.

P4 3.0E , get that since intel discontinued 130nm northwoods. the prescott is hot, but it's worth it. 1mb L2 cache, advanced hyperhtreading, and SSE3 support. best cpu purchase i made since the Pentium Pro.

------
Prescott 3.0E 1MB L2 HT
1GB PC 3200 Dual channel(PAT)
Asus P4P800 Bios 1016
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
58,556 Aquamarks
 

darko21

Distinguished
Sep 15, 2003
1,098
0
19,280
P4 3.0E , get that since intel discontinued 130nm northwoods. the prescott is hot, but it's worth it.

Discontinued looks like 90 is so bad 130 might be the <A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20040731144157.html" target="_new"> future </A>

If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart. <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by darko21 on 08/01/04 00:37 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

trooper11

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2004
758
0
18,980
now come on, thats an unfair shot, there is no reason to trust amd or intel over the other. lets try to help people here, lets not try to force our prefrences on others and be open minded to other possibilities.
 

JJKP77

Distinguished
Jul 26, 2004
22
0
18,510
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would go Intel, I don't trust AMD.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

well thats just the most retarded thing i think i have ever had to hear.
What exactly do you trust i wonder. good luck with your trust issues.
I recommend a Centrum A-Z.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
yes, go Intel. can't lose with Intel. they don't lose.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

They are losing. Not a big sports fan eh fanboy? hardware's hardware and right now AMD's Hardware is better.
If intel's were the better buy i would gladly say so.

--------------------------------------------
P4 3.0E , get that since intel discontinued 130nm northwoods. the prescott is hot, but it's worth it.
============================================
worth it as in... You're most likely to win the "Your hardware that was brand spanking new and really
expensive, but has now become obsolete the fastest" award. Definitely worth it if you are trying to
win that contest. Hands down.

If someone offered me a pair of shoes at k-mart that would still be compatible with the next generation
of sidewalks for the next 5 years or a pair of shoes from Macy's that would melt and leave me hanging
in 2 years I am certain i'ld go with the Kmart brand. Go pick up a toothpick.

AMD Athlon XP 2100+-=-1Gb PC2700-=-40Gb WDD HDD-=-
16x DvD-=-32x12x40 Lite on CD/RW-=-Floppy, "Who needs a damned floppy!"-=-ECS K7S5A Pro-=- Geforce 4 Ti 4400 128Mb 4x-=-
 

JJKP77

Distinguished
Jul 26, 2004
22
0
18,510
now come on, thats an unfair shot, there is no reason to trust amd or intel over the other. lets try to help people here, lets not try to force our prefrences on others and be open minded to other possibilities.
=======================================
really.
If you don't praise the enemy when he's winning, you will never truly appreciate
WHY & HOW he's winning. The point is, praise AMD for thier brilliance even if
you don't like them. Otherwise your just blinded by the light and unless you're a black
guy sitting at a piano with sunglasses on not many folks are gonna
listen to the notes you're making. :p
Fanboys were never cut out to be true techies IMHO. Good day.

AMD Athlon XP 2100+-=-1Gb PC2700-=-40Gb WDD HDD-=-
16x DvD-=-32x12x40 Lite on CD/RW-=-Floppy, "Who needs a damned floppy!"-=-ECS K7S5A Pro-=- Geforce 4 Ti 4400 128Mb 4x-=-
 

trooper11

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2004
758
0
18,980
huh, you directing something towards me or them? if its me , i dont quite understand what you think i was saying. all i was trying to say is taht the numbers are in amd's favor in alot of areas right nwo and they should admit that, no matter if they dispise amd or not, they cant let such things force them into giving biased or bad advice to ppl needing help.
 

Kanavit

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2004
390
0
18,780
P4 3.0E , get that since intel discontinued 130nm northwoods. the prescott is hot, but it's worth it.

Discontinued looks like 90 is so bad 130 might be the future
Darko21, that 130nm was for the P4 ee only in LGA 775. everything else will be 90nm.

------
Prescott 3.0E 1MB L2 HT
1GB PC 3200 Dual channel(PAT)
Asus P4P800 Bios 1016
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
58,556 Aquamarks
 

Mephistopheles

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2003
2,444
0
19,780
I wonder what would happen if they simply made a 90nm Northwood? No change in design, except process?... Should be better than northwood, especially when coupled with 1066Mhz FSB.

As for recommending a CPU, I agree in particular with P4Man. Each platform has its strengths and weaknesses, and you can't really go terribly wrong. A64 is more future-proof than the current Intel alternatives, but Intel CPUs do extremely well in some video encoding and rendering tasks, for instance. Gaming is generally better with A64 right now, and 64-bit might give it a performance increase somewhere later. Much later, apparently.

<i><font color=red>You never change the existing reality by fighting it. Instead, create a new model that makes the old one obsolete</font color=red> - Buckminster Fuller </i><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Mephistopheles on 08/01/04 01:32 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Cybercraig

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,058
0
19,780
I would wait 30 - 45 days and see what shakes out. Prices HAVE to come down for Intel and AMD's are already falling. If you jump now you may miss a good deal on a better platform. JMHO

Abit IS7 - 2.8C @ 3.4 - Mushkin PC4000 (2 X 512) - Sapphire 9800Pro - TT 420 watt Pure Power
Samsung 120gb ATA-100 - Maxtor 40gb ATA - 100
Sony DRU-510A - THAT'S MORE LIKE IT!
 

Kanavit

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2004
390
0
18,780
I wonder what would happen if they simply made a 90nm Northwood? No change in design, except process?... Should be better than northwood, especially when coupled with 1066Mhz FSB.
Good point, i think the die size would be super small. I'm not sure how much better clockspeeds will ramp, 90nm process on northwoods would probably suffer the same thermal leakage as the prescott cores. which means extraordinary temps. 90nm was important because these allowed intel to produce larger prescott cores with Northwood yields on 300mm wafers. Hence, the prescotts cost the same as northwoods but come with 1mb of cache.

------
Prescott 3.0E 1MB L2 HT
1GB PC 3200 Dual channel(PAT)
Asus P4P800 Bios 1016
PNY Geforce 6800 GT 256MB DDR3
58,556 Aquamarks
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
I would go Intel, I don't trust AMD.
you have no idea what your talking about, kthnx


PLEASE indulge me with details as to why, otherwise keep your preferences to yourself
-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
<A HREF="http://www.subhi.com/keyboard.jpg" target="_new">This is you, interweb junky</A>
 

endyen

Splendid
I dont think that northwoods would suffer as badly with leakage current. More than 50% more pipes means a lot more interconnects, which means a lot more dissimalar charges. Plactically speaking, a northwood on 90 nanos should see a fair reduction in heat. At least 10%. They would probably have been able to scale past 4 gigs by now. The 1066 fsb may have been a problem for the north bridge though. I wouldn't expect any ECS board to be able to hand that kind of overclock, no matter what the chipset.
 
G

Guest

Guest
totally agree with ya endyen.
Look at the Dothan Vs Banias, tell me 90nm process has a problem...

Asus P4P800DX, P4C 2.6ghz@3.25ghz, 2X512 OCZ PC4000 3-4-4-8, Leadtek FX5900 w/ FX5950U bios@500/1000, 2X30gig Raid0