Hey there,
i'm going to be playing a lot of games such as Borderlands 2, planetside 2 and other games but i'm also going to be playing a lot of 'next gen games' like The witcher 3, Titanfall, Battlefield 4 etc. I know the Gtx 770 and r9 280x are about equal in terms of performance give or take a few fps depending on the game but there is a lot of things that make it hard to decide.
The gtx 770 apparently has more stable drivers and cool features like Physx which is meant to be really good but is not in many games (yet), and G-sync but that means buying a new monitor which isn't worth it. But it only has 2gb of vram which could be an issue in future games and that is one of the main concerns.
The r9 280x is £20 cheaper but does not come with 3 free games but im not really interested in, it has mantle which is supposed to increase fps and 3gb of vram which seems perfect for new games coming out.
I'll be playing at 1920x1080 and ill be using a i5 4670k.
i'm going to be playing a lot of games such as Borderlands 2, planetside 2 and other games but i'm also going to be playing a lot of 'next gen games' like The witcher 3, Titanfall, Battlefield 4 etc. I know the Gtx 770 and r9 280x are about equal in terms of performance give or take a few fps depending on the game but there is a lot of things that make it hard to decide.
The gtx 770 apparently has more stable drivers and cool features like Physx which is meant to be really good but is not in many games (yet), and G-sync but that means buying a new monitor which isn't worth it. But it only has 2gb of vram which could be an issue in future games and that is one of the main concerns.
The r9 280x is £20 cheaper but does not come with 3 free games but im not really interested in, it has mantle which is supposed to increase fps and 3gb of vram which seems perfect for new games coming out.
I'll be playing at 1920x1080 and ill be using a i5 4670k.