Hello.
This is a open discussion.
First here's a interesting/useful article, for anyone don't know what we are talking: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/panel_technologies.htm
I have a laptop which screen is ridiculously bad, it hurt my eyes for real, even reading text is somehow hard. I think it's mainly because it have a very low contrast ratio and very narrow view angle, the black area washed out even at the lowest brightness, and even if I look directly to the center, the top and bottom are different in color...
I also have a monitor which seems use TN panel, but having a very satisfied picture, deep enough dark, and wide enough view angle.
Many people says IPS>VA>TN, but some also pointed out that, although IPS have the widest view angle, VA have the highest contrast. For people have used both of them, which advantage is more obvious / which issue is more unacceptable?
Also I know all of them have been improved year after year, although sometimes remain the same name.
Welcome to talk.
Thanks.
This is a open discussion.
First here's a interesting/useful article, for anyone don't know what we are talking: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/panel_technologies.htm
I have a laptop which screen is ridiculously bad, it hurt my eyes for real, even reading text is somehow hard. I think it's mainly because it have a very low contrast ratio and very narrow view angle, the black area washed out even at the lowest brightness, and even if I look directly to the center, the top and bottom are different in color...
I also have a monitor which seems use TN panel, but having a very satisfied picture, deep enough dark, and wide enough view angle.
Many people says IPS>VA>TN, but some also pointed out that, although IPS have the widest view angle, VA have the highest contrast. For people have used both of them, which advantage is more obvious / which issue is more unacceptable?
Also I know all of them have been improved year after year, although sometimes remain the same name.
Welcome to talk.
Thanks.