I am considering a Dell 6400 laptop with Vista and a Core 2 Duo T7200 CPU that has a FSB of 667 MHz.
I will not be overclocking or playing games. I mostly edit photos non-professionally. Performance is important, including booting up and application loading. I will be getting a 7200 rpm HDD, but I want to avoid disk caching. Battery life is not important.
The laptop has two SoDIMM sockets that are both user-accessible. The RAM is shared with the integrated GPU.
The laptop comes standard with 1 gig of 533 MHz RAM spread over the two SoDIMMS, but I would like a total of 2 gigs when I buy the laptop (and ideally 4 gigs later though it looks like 2 gigs is the most that this motherboard can handle).
For a 2 gig setup, Dell gives the option of either 533 MHz or 667 MHz. The 2 gigs of 667 MHz RAM would be CAD$375, that is, 340% more expensive than 2 gigs of 533 MHz RAM at CAD$110.
Is 667 MHz worth the extra cost, or should I stick to 533 MHz?
This seems like it would be a common question, but I did not see it in the FAQ.
Your advice would be appreciated.
Fuzzy
I will not be overclocking or playing games. I mostly edit photos non-professionally. Performance is important, including booting up and application loading. I will be getting a 7200 rpm HDD, but I want to avoid disk caching. Battery life is not important.
The laptop has two SoDIMM sockets that are both user-accessible. The RAM is shared with the integrated GPU.
The laptop comes standard with 1 gig of 533 MHz RAM spread over the two SoDIMMS, but I would like a total of 2 gigs when I buy the laptop (and ideally 4 gigs later though it looks like 2 gigs is the most that this motherboard can handle).
For a 2 gig setup, Dell gives the option of either 533 MHz or 667 MHz. The 2 gigs of 667 MHz RAM would be CAD$375, that is, 340% more expensive than 2 gigs of 533 MHz RAM at CAD$110.
Is 667 MHz worth the extra cost, or should I stick to 533 MHz?
This seems like it would be a common question, but I did not see it in the FAQ.
Your advice would be appreciated.
Fuzzy
).