Which of these two SFFs would be better for video editing?

[CuriousAmerican]

I am interested in video editing, but only for ten minute or so clips. Using Adobe Premiere Elements.

Which of these two would be better?

By Computer Upgrade King

https://cukusa.com/cuk-axiom-amd-mini-desktop-computer.html

Configured to

# R5 2400 G APU
250GB SSD
16GB 2400 RAM


Or https://cukusa.com/cuk-axiom-ts-i3-8300-8gb-ram-1tb-sshd-tiny-desktop-pc.html

Configured to

i7-8700
250GB NVMe + 1 TB HD
16GB 2400 RAM

=================

I want a somewhat small computer, not one with a graphics card.

Would the higher core and frequency of the i7-8700 outperform the APU of the Ryzen 5.

This company varies from great reviews to horrendous, but no inbetween. Are they good with one disgruntled customer or what?


I knew the Intel version has NVMe, but it also does not have an APU. The question is: Does the Ryzen APU outweight the CPU performance and extra cores on the Intel.

 

[profoundnoah]

I would say that the 8700 is the way to go. The 6-cores/12-threads combined with QuickSync support pretty much outweighs the 2400G's GPU. The only reason I'd go with the 2400G would be for timeline performance. But again, that depends on your settings etc. What is your budget? I may be able to assist you in building a FAR more powerful PC that is still compact, and may even be a lower price.

 

[superninja12]

you can not compare an i7 8700 ot a ryzen 5.
thats unfair, ofcourse the i7 is better for video edditing.

 

[CuriousAmerican]

you can not compare an i7 8700 ot a ryzen 5.
thats unfair, ofcourse the i7 is better for video edditing.

Even though the Ryzen 5 has an APU, while the 8700 only has UHD 630 iGPU?

 

[profoundnoah]

I would do some research into how both of the integrated chips perform in ALL aspects of editing, not just rendering. I believe the 2400g might be a bit better with timeline browsing.