Which one should i take

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

arifmanzoor

Distinguished
Oct 6, 2002
46
0
18,530
Hi! I am going to take a new graphic card, but i am really confused which one should i take, i am looking at ATi 9600XT or Nvidia 5900 Ultra, which one of these are better that can last for an year or so. Also i want to know that how much i can O/C them to perform well in the games.
 
The jury is up between those two.

Both are awesome cards; you can't really go wrong with either.

The 5900 has alot of power and bandwidth, the 9600XT has more shader power & finesse. And the 9600XT comes with the Half Life 2 voucher.

Still, I lean towards the 5900. It's a pretty powerful card for the price.

<b>[EDIT] 5900 ULTRA? Oh heck, I thought you were comparing the 9600XT to the 5900 non-ultra/XT/se
Hell, yes. That's easy... go 5900 ULTRA[EDIT]</b>

________________
<b>Radeon <font color=red>9500 PRO</b></font color=red> <i>(hardmodded 9500, o/c 322/322)</i>
<b>AthlonXP <font color=red>2600+</b></font color=red> <i>(o/c 2400+ w/143Mhz fsb)</i>
<b>3dMark03: <font color=red>4,055</b></font color=red><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Cleeve on 01/13/04 03:55 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
5900U!!!!!

EDIT: forgot to say why: lots more power than 9600XT. Shaders are worse, but nVidia's Software team seems to have done well with the hardware team's F-up. Raw bandwidth should make up for the worsened shaders anyway.

Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Vapor on 01/13/04 12:46 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
I'd be inclined to go with the 5900U. If you were comparing same line video cards I'd be inclined to go with the 9600xt.

<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/html/shadus.html" target="_new">Shadus</A>
 
97.7% of the time the FX5900U.

And the times that favour the FX5900U will likely do so at a large margin, whereas the R9600XT's RARE premium will amount to a small advantage.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:
 
LIES!

It is clearly 92.4%

________________
<b>Radeon <font color=red>9500 PRO</b></font color=red> <i>(hardmodded 9500, o/c 322/322)</i>
<b>AthlonXP <font color=red>2600+</b></font color=red> <i>(o/c 2400+ w/143Mhz fsb)</i>
<b>3dMark03: <font color=red>4,055</b></font color=red>
 
If priced identical, this ATI fan would grab the FX5900U in a second. But from what I have seen, the FX5900 Ultra is at least $100-$150 more. Then I'd grab the radeon 9600XT and HL2 for sure. Please correct me if I am wrong, but aren't 5900 Ultra's still priced as high as Radeon 9800 pro's? Also be careful because the names used for cards are tricky to figure out. Worst of all is Gainward where names such as FX5900 FX Ultra 1100, which is an FX5900 (non-Ultra) card. Gainward makes great cards, but their naming scheme seems made in order to profit by deceit.

ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 512MB Corsair TwinX PC3200LL, Radeon 9500 Pro, Santa Cruz, Antec 1000AMG, TruePower 430watt
 
Man seriously, focus. You need to convert to metric BEFORE you take the derivative. Rookie mistake! :tongue:


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:
 
Ouch! Dude, that was 39% more lame than even <b>my</b> crappy attempt at humor. (46% imp. measure)

Sweet Jesus, to what depths have we sunk?

________________
<b>Radeon <font color=red>9500 PRO</b></font color=red> <i>(hardmodded 9500, o/c 322/322)</i>
<b>AthlonXP <font color=red>2600+</b></font color=red> <i>(o/c 2400+ w/143Mhz fsb)</i>
<b>3dMark03: <font color=red>4,055</b></font color=red>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom