- Oct 26, 2013
- 11
- 0
- 10,510
Ok, what follows is a bit of a long rant, BUT at the same time It's asking real questions here... despite the anger that flows through me in this post. I do ask your pardon(s) on that, but my singular question here is... why?:
Here I am asking for a reason to why no company,not even benq or asus, has even attempted to put out a 4k 144hz (or even 165hz) monitor? We have 2k from asus at 165hz on an IPS pannel. So what's the problem here? Not enough content, higher end video cards still not capable with live in-game 4k resolution?
I personally think that if you can do ips at 2k, a TN pannel at 4k would be possible.
I'm sorry, but I've been waiting quite a while now since getting my first asus 144hz monitor for a 4k variation and nothing... I haven't even heard so much as a peep out of the devs about development so far. Admitately I haven't gone out of my way just yet to find any videos or blogs or such about it, but... yea what's up here?
I for one am ready to shill out hard-earned money to asus or even benq (despite their outrageous markup). Hell I don't care about brand as I have no loyalties really. All I care about is quality of product, and thus longevity, and having 4k at at least 144hz.
Honestly I don't think there's a lack of ability to build one at that rate, I am of the mind atm that it's just that the "mid range pc" can't handle the 4k resolution in game at ultra high settings for those that would support it if any? Perhaps lack of content... but that's not stopped them before. That's what is kinda making me miffed at the moment towards the major companies... how long has 4k now been out but no one is touching the 144hz area for it? Hell, at 4k you don't need ultra-high settings anymore if the game is developed with 4k resolution in mind in the animations and textures... at this point all you would need is at most 2x or 4x AA (of any sort) and you're good unless you go ultra close.
Am I wrong? I know I have a very standoffish attitude with this post, and please do pardon that if you can. I'm just about at my wits end at waiting here. I'm normally quite patient... but 4k has now been around for how many years? June 2001 wasn't it with the IBM T220? I think we have had WAY more than enough time to get to where we need to be, and am just agast at the fact that we haven't even seen a peep of it so far? 2k? is that all we get 15 years down the road?
Am I the only one that thinks it is more than "high time" we get a 4k monitor at at least 144hz? Especially now that 2k is possible on an IPS at 165! Come on asus, benq, sony, phillips, Someone, ANYONE... yeesh...
Here I am asking for a reason to why no company,not even benq or asus, has even attempted to put out a 4k 144hz (or even 165hz) monitor? We have 2k from asus at 165hz on an IPS pannel. So what's the problem here? Not enough content, higher end video cards still not capable with live in-game 4k resolution?
I personally think that if you can do ips at 2k, a TN pannel at 4k would be possible.
I'm sorry, but I've been waiting quite a while now since getting my first asus 144hz monitor for a 4k variation and nothing... I haven't even heard so much as a peep out of the devs about development so far. Admitately I haven't gone out of my way just yet to find any videos or blogs or such about it, but... yea what's up here?
I for one am ready to shill out hard-earned money to asus or even benq (despite their outrageous markup). Hell I don't care about brand as I have no loyalties really. All I care about is quality of product, and thus longevity, and having 4k at at least 144hz.
Honestly I don't think there's a lack of ability to build one at that rate, I am of the mind atm that it's just that the "mid range pc" can't handle the 4k resolution in game at ultra high settings for those that would support it if any? Perhaps lack of content... but that's not stopped them before. That's what is kinda making me miffed at the moment towards the major companies... how long has 4k now been out but no one is touching the 144hz area for it? Hell, at 4k you don't need ultra-high settings anymore if the game is developed with 4k resolution in mind in the animations and textures... at this point all you would need is at most 2x or 4x AA (of any sort) and you're good unless you go ultra close.
Am I wrong? I know I have a very standoffish attitude with this post, and please do pardon that if you can. I'm just about at my wits end at waiting here. I'm normally quite patient... but 4k has now been around for how many years? June 2001 wasn't it with the IBM T220? I think we have had WAY more than enough time to get to where we need to be, and am just agast at the fact that we haven't even seen a peep of it so far? 2k? is that all we get 15 years down the road?
Am I the only one that thinks it is more than "high time" we get a 4k monitor at at least 144hz? Especially now that 2k is possible on an IPS at 165! Come on asus, benq, sony, phillips, Someone, ANYONE... yeesh...
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram