Ryan_78 :
Yes we claim to use the highest quality PSUs. Why? They provide the reliability and stability spend life for the system. Lower quality PSUs like the 600B and the CX600 are not reliable because of the poor quality of the capacitator S inside. The inside components are higher quality in the EVGA 650 g2 vs the cx600 because they use Japanese capacitators, and the CX use budget ones. You seem to be applying that quality means rating, but rating has nothin to do with quality. The S12II PSUs are good quality but are bronze. Getting the best power supply will ensure that the PSU does not fry your whole expensive system. The
psu tier list/
Is a good guideline for PSUs, and so does jhonnyguru reviews. Do not look at just amps and rating and wattage, you must lol for quality components
You're completely missing the point and you misunderstood most of what I said.
I wasnt asserting that you should recommend something less than the highest quality PSUs out there.
I was simply stating that it isnt
required to run the system stable with the graphics card and specs in question.
When we're talking about whether a PSU is capable of supporting the entire system at maximum load, those PSUs that you wont recommend and deem of lower quality will still do the job just fine.
That is the point that you missed.
I agree that the more quality components and japanese capacitors will make a product that is more reliable and will probably live longer. But dont make it appear as if the 600B or the CS600 are unreliable and will break or even that will cause instability in the system. You're presenting it as if it is a black/white situation where either a PSU is reliable or unreliable. This is not the case.
No I didnt assert that quality means rating, and if you read my post more carefully, you'd understand that.
I specifically said that "it doesnt have anything to do with certification (aka rating)" meaning that bronze PSUs can be more than capable of supporting the entire system just fine, and their certification is irrelevant to that fact, as it refers to efficiency.
I wasnt arguing against your recommendations and I do not care about toms PSU tier list. These are irrelevant and by mentioning them over and over again you are demonstrating that you are missing the point.