OK. You do not need a Titan X for that. A much cheaper GTX 980ti is still overkill and a good overclocked GTX 980 will do the job. I might point out that every card drops below 60FPS at times during play, on any CPU.
You would need SLI 980s to avoid that.
Read this : http://wccftech.com/witcher-3-gtx-970980titan-r9-290290x-benchmark-framerate-tests/
You can set up situations where either will bottleneck the other - e.g. 4K gaming with high levels of AA, you can bring the Titan X down below 30fps in most titles, which is far less than the i5 is capable of, causing the GPU to be the bottleneck. Alternatively, you could run 1080P @ 120hz and the Titan will almost certainly not hit the framerates it could have with a faster CPU.
If spending $1000+ on a video card, I wouldn't recommend a sub-$200 CPU, but the i5 is no slouch. I think an i7 4790K or (better) an i7 6700K would be a better match for that GPU.
Sure, but if spending $1,000 on a video card, why not spend an extra $100 on a CPU? Doesn't make any sense.
I actually posted this question to find out if I absolutely must upgrade my CPU. If the titan won't bottleneck my i5, then i stand to save some money. If it will, then i guess i'm gonna have to upgrade.
OK. You do not need a Titan X for that. A much cheaper GTX 980ti is still overkill and a good overclocked GTX 980 will do the job. I might point out that every card drops below 60FPS at times during play, on any CPU.
You would need SLI 980s to avoid that.
Read this : http://wccftech.com/witcher-3-gtx-970980titan-r9-290290x-benchmark-framerate-tests/