For the requirements and R9600non-pro (and not SE) from Gigabyte and Sapphire would be the best inexpensive passive solutions out there. It's much better than a NORMAL hsf equipped FX5600, and the only passive FX5600 is an SE/XT so it's infinitely better.
The only thing better than the R9600 for that generation with just a heatsink/pipe is the Sapphire Ulimate R9600/9700/9800 cards, and they are far more expensive. There is a new passive GF6800 in the works (looks nice with Matrox/Tyan's colours), but that's more expensive still.
For that series, nothing beats an R9600 for quick passive power. The FX5600 are the biggest wastes of money and the only FX5200 worth a dime is the FX5200Ultra, and they are not passive, and cost more than an R9600 most times.
If passive is not a concern and we are talking about older games, then the GF4ti series is the best in that range, if new games become an issue, then the R9600 would hold the edge. But for the game in question the GF4ti has an edge, but it does have a noticeable HSF.
The R9200SE like the FX5200 perform below the MX series, but I would only recommend those for image quality, not for gaming; and in that respect they are far better than the GF4MX AND the GF4ti.
EDIT: Also the 128mb version of the R9600 while clocked the same has BETTER memory timings than the R9600-256mb, and almost always the 128 beats the 256.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 07/09/04 05:31 PM.</EM></FONT></P>