Hey guys, I was just wondering, is there really a big difference between, say, 16xAF vs 2xAF, or high AA vs low or no AA? Coz(as posted in the other forum) I was debating between upgrading my processor from a 970 to a core i5 2500k and stick with my card which is a 5770, or stick with the 970(or sell it and get a 955. The 970 is brand new by the way. Its a gift) and use the extra cash to get a better GPU.
The thing is, thinking long term, basing on the benchmarks, I see that the 2500k would probable benefit me more. If that's the case, I could stick with the 5770 for the (really long)mean time. I use a 1680x1050 monitor, and don't plan on upgrading that at all.
Given that, I know I probably won't be able to max out games that much, especially the AA and AF, since(I believe) these are the ones that put the greatest stress on the GPU. So my question is, is the difference between high AF and low AF, as well as high AA versus low AA, really that noticeable? I normally game with, like, 2xAF and no AA, and they're pretty sweet. But if there's really something better out there, and its a really big diff that's worth getting a better vid card over a better CPU for, I'd go for it.
The thing is, thinking long term, basing on the benchmarks, I see that the 2500k would probable benefit me more. If that's the case, I could stick with the 5770 for the (really long)mean time. I use a 1680x1050 monitor, and don't plan on upgrading that at all.
Given that, I know I probably won't be able to max out games that much, especially the AA and AF, since(I believe) these are the ones that put the greatest stress on the GPU. So my question is, is the difference between high AF and low AF, as well as high AA versus low AA, really that noticeable? I normally game with, like, 2xAF and no AA, and they're pretty sweet. But if there's really something better out there, and its a really big diff that's worth getting a better vid card over a better CPU for, I'd go for it.