You will have no issues. For gpu intensive games my i7 930@3.8ghz has kept up with my 295x2 and 970 sli. Dropping to stock 2.8ghz clocks I drop 5-10fps.
You will have no issues. For gpu intensive games my i7 930@3.8ghz has kept up with my 295x2 and 970 sli. Dropping to stock 2.8ghz clocks I drop 5-10fps.
wow thanks guys. ill be researching and experimenting with overclocking tonight. seems that people reach 4.0 clock speeds on the 920 regularly.. and i have a closed loop watercooler also.
i have owned it for a little over a year purchased used. learning the ins and outs.
At stock clocks, the i7 920 does bottleneck a number of games that tend to be more CPU bound. If you get your clocks up to 3.5Ghz or higher, you'll be bottlenecked a lot less often. But no CPU is ever immune to bottlenecks as long as games like Arma and DayZ exist.
Bottlenecking is when the CPU limits the GPU, and not allowing it to be fully utilized.
Once again, No, it will not bottleneck the GPU. Would you get a couple more FPS with a 4790K, yes. Bottleneck, no.
Yes, that is the correct definition, and it does happen with an i7 920 at stock clocks quite often. Losing 5-10 FPS due to having stock clocks is the definition of limiting the GPU. Using MSI afterburner and watching the GPU usage is a better way to see. With my 680's, I am rarely over 90% usage on my GPU's in many games I play. At stock clocks, I see it drop to below 50% usage a lot.
I have an i7 920, if you haven't noticed, and I run into situations all the time where default clocks cost me 20+ FPS. If you always play at max settings, and high resolutions, it happens less often, but if you play at settings that give you 70+ FPS, you see it hold you back a lot if you are using default clocks.
It doesn't happen in all games, but it does happen in many.