David Nabinger :
OC wont do you any good. The x6 series are actually quite weak. I have been searching and searching. In the end I decided to replace my old x6 1055t OC to 3.5 for an i7 3790k. Its still in the mail but from what i see all over the internet is its 3 times faster in ALL games and everything else.
Look I hate to be anti AMD but their CPU's are priced high for their actual worth.
OC'ing always helps as long as heat is managed well. But it's not going to be enough to catch up to Intel. And I suspect that i7 is more than 3 times faster in some games.
My brother just replaced his Phenom II X6 1090T with an i5-4590, and performance literally doubled in many games. The only reason it didn't
more than double is because his video card became the bottleneck.
Everyone goes on about AMD having a great price/performance ratio, but I don't see it. All the in-game benchmarks I've looked at show Intel having a better price/performance ratio for gaming.
At the $80 point, you have the Pentium G3258 running faster, cheaper, and cooler than the Athlon 760K.
At the $120 point, you have the i3-4150 outperforming the FX-6300 in practically all games.
At the $160 point, you have the i3-4360 roughly matching the FX-8350 in most multithreaded games, beating it in games meant for 4 threads or less.
At the $220 point, you have the i5-4690 or i5-4690K stomping on the FX-9370 in all games.
At the $300 point, the i7-4770 or i7-4790 once again beats the FX-9590 in speed, power, and heat.
Plus, you know, with my build I'm actually using so little power that just from my energy bill savings compared to AMD I could buy a new CPU every year, at no real cost.