Currently no cards would be crippled, even a 2080ti would only lose a few frames.Thank you for clearing that up.
What is the max graphics card that would not be crippled at PCIe 3.0 x8? Assuming the CPU wasn't the weak link, that is.
The 4GB RX5500 does get crippled by 3.0x8: upgrading to a platform with 4.0x8 gives it 20-50% more performance in VRAM-constrained cases. Higher-end GPUs don't suffer as much because they have more VRAM and therefore don't need to hit system memory anywhere near as much.Currently no cards would be crippled, even a 2080ti would only lose a few frames.
Interesting.The 4GB RX5500 does get crippled by 3.0x8: upgrading to a platform with 4.0x8 gives it 20-50% more performance in VRAM-constrained cases. Higher-end GPUs don't suffer as much because they have more VRAM and therefore don't need to hit system memory anywhere near as much.
Also, the RX5500 only have a 4.0x8 PCIe interface, so it would be limited to x8 regardless of CPU.
Building a budget PC for someone. Just realized the CPU we ordered (Ryzen 5 3400g) was limited to 8 lanes PCIe. Is this true? Will it make a difference gaming with a RX 5500 XT at 1080p?
Or if you look at the Far Cry results in your link, with 4.0, you don't need to lower details in the first place since it performs nearly as good as the 8GB version.Looks like you'd just have to lower the settings to reduce vram usage, likely you normally would when you are vram limited.
I used google translate.Lots of interesting stuff to read there. Btw, the RX 5500 XT we have is the 8GB version if that matters.
bignastyid... wish I could read German.
They weren't available anywhere. Can you find one for us?If intending a discrete GPU, best to skip the 3400G, and opt for a 3300X....