Between the i9 11900K and low end Xeons there seems to me there's a hole in their product stack, maybe an i9 11980XE?
Intel also didn't release any 11th gen celeron and pentiums, is that also because of the die size and power?!Intel hasn't had a new HEDT platform for its X-series CPUs since the X299's monumental flop and there are no plans for a new one anywhere yet. The i9-11900k is already pushing 250W peak, adding any more cores would require a substantial down-clock to keep temperatures and power draw somewhat manageable.
I'm not expecting Intel to take another shot at HEDT until its 7nm fabs are ready, it has too much of a die size and power handicap on 10/14nm.
The low-end got Comet Lake refreshes like Howard pointed out. Intel was already struggling with meeting demand before covid-19 and now that its i5-i9 range has much larger dies than before, it has even fewer wafers to spare for the low-end. It generally makes sense that the bottom-end would get dropped first when manufacturing capacity gets tight.Intel also didn't release any 11th gen celeron and pentiums, is that also because of the die size and power?!
Hm the low end Lakefield processors pioneered desktop X86/64 hybrid architecture using one big core and five small cores, so I think Intel/Microsoft got driver/OS cooperation out of the way, but only time will tell about how desktop computers perform.Intel is supposedly producing 10nm desktop CPUs, to arrive end of this year.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-says-first-10nm-desktop-cpus-land-in-second-half-of-2021
We don't really know what to expect from these chips though. They'll supposedly have the big.LITTLE CPU core design (performance cores along side power efficient cores).
I forsee all sorts of issues - from cooling hotspots to software/driver design problems with this CPU. Hopefully I'm wrong but we'll see.
That is exactly what happened to the Ryzen 3 3300X and the 3100. AMD (to me) priced these too aggressively, so a low profit margin for AMD, less desirable to produce, so they are utterly impossible to find at retail.The low-end got Comet Lake refreshes like Howard pointed out. Intel was already struggling with meeting demand before covid-19 and now that its i5-i9 range has much larger dies than before, it has even fewer wafers to spare for the low-end. It generally makes sense that the bottom-end would get dropped first when manufacturing capacity gets tight.
AMD does not "make" 3100/3300X/3500, those are made from defective CCDs (bad cores or cache) that would have been scrapped otherwise. AMD has every incentive to not have any to sell and the low availability simply means that yields got that good with sales holding strong enough that AMD did not have excess dies to sacrifice for anything below the 3600.That is exactly what happened to the Ryzen 3 3300X and the 3100. AMD (to me) priced these too aggressively, so a low profit margin for AMD, less desirable to produce, so they are utterly impossible to find at retail.
AMD's current processors have the potential for similar issues. The "rice grain sized drop in the middle" thermal paste application method doesn't really apply to AMD's recent processors because of the awkward die configuration.I forsee all sorts of issues - from cooling hotspots to software/driver design problems with this CPU. Hopefully I'm wrong but we'll see.
Hm yeah, but it still proves these are too hard to make compared to profit and therefore other CPUs. So AMD doesn't produce these.AMD does not "make" 3100/3300X/3500, those are made from defective CCDs (bad cores or cache) that would have been scrapped otherwise. AMD has every incentive to not have any to sell and the low availability simply means that yields got that good with sales holding strong enough that AMD did not have excess dies to sacrifice for anything below the 3600.