tomshardwarenoob :
1.It will still run in dual channel asynchronous.
2.Of course the faster ram would have to be underclocked to match the slower ram, or the slower ram overclocked.
3.Not if the faster ram is underclocked.
All of which have a negative impact on performance. I didn't see anything as yet as to what expectations are for the extra RAM. It's all about what the net impact was.... let's say you **might** benefit from the extra RAM 15% of the time that an application needs more than 8 GB, that means that 85% of the time you are going slower. If this is a gaming box, than I know of two games that do better with 16GB than 8GB ... that means of memory even has an impact on performance, the opportunity to realize a performance gain is limited to two games, and the opportunity to have a performance decrease exists with everything else.
I have bunches of old hardware left here in the last 25 years and i have tried to add it to my kids builds or other users who ask about "any extra RAM lying around ?".... in all those instances, rarely saw an observable benefit.
Example: Adding 2 x 2Gb to 2 x 4GB ... most games unaffected... some slight decreases
Example: and this was a weird one. A user with 2 x 4GB of DDR2 (Corsair) wanted to go to 8 GB. I had a helluva time finding anything at same speed and CAS timing but did find a set from Gskill. With it being so hard to find, figured I'd up the 2 x 4Gb Mushkin set in my youngest son's box... so bought 2 sets.
The GSkill added in with the Corsair ... couldn't get hem to play well together.
The GSkill added in with the Mushkin ... couldn't get hem to play well together.
On a whim, I tried taking the Corsairs out of the user's build and added it to my son's ... booted up w/o hitch, no tweaks ... as expected the two GSkills played well together.
I saw this again recently (Z87 / Z97 era) when a user had a set of Corsair DDR-3 2400 w/ 10-12-12-28 timings. After version 4.51 Corsair switched to a less expensive supplier which had 10-12-12-31 timings. The original sets used modules from Hynix, I can't remember who made the newer ones. But Mushkin continued to use Hynix throughout the entire production run so the set of Mushkins I had we tested in his rig and they worked just fine.
Of course 1600 is a lot easier than 2400 ..
Also ran into this recently.... a user brought over his box of stuff to build and he had a 2 x 4GB set of RAM
($63) CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 8GB (2 x 4GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3200 CAS 16
He said that he wanted to add another set of this RAM as he realized he wanted 16 GB for AutoCAD. So he would be into this for $126 for two sets of RAM that "might work" together. Here's what we did instead:
Bought ($99) CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 8GB (
2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3200 CAS 16 and he sold the original 2 x 4Gb set on Craig's List for $50
So instead of spending an extra $63 for 16GB *upgrade* that might work, he spent $49 instead to get 16Gb. He now had a set of RAM that was a) was guaranteed to work, b) wouldn't have the hit that comes with using 4 sticks instead of 2, c) put $14 dollars back in his pocket and d), didn't have to fiddle with voltage and timings adjustments.